Schlagwort: YHWH

God’s name in the OT

  • Being God’s Image – Part 6

    Being God’s Image – Part 6

    By Christian / Carmen Joy Imes


    In this series, we look at thoughts from the book Being God’s Image – Why Creation still matters by Carmen Joy Imes. As there is unfortunately no German translation, we will at least deal with excerpts from her presentation in the German version of this video. This English version contains the same excerpts, but I recommend that you read the complete book.

    As announced in the fifth part, the rest of the series will focus on ‚Human in God’s new world‘.

    Human in God’s New World

    Genesis 1 conveys our essential human identity as the image of God, introducing an important theme in Scripture. However, the phrase „image of God“ only appears in Genesis 1, 5, and 9. After that, the topic of bearing God’s name comes to the fore.

    If we then move on to the New Testament, we find a few more passages in which the image of God is mentioned. Strikingly, these all refer to Jesus. And now comes the kicker:

    Jesus, the Human

    Jesus is not the image of God because he is God. Jesus is the image of God because he is human.

    His entry into human history is not plan B but the culmination of plan A. And this also explains why the Gospel of John begins with words like those in Genesis 1:1: „In the beginning was …“ While every human being is God’s image, Jesus fulfills God’s intentions perfectly for the vocation entailed by this identity. „who shines with the same glory… Is the exact image of His being…“ (Hebrews 1:3 2001 Translation). The Father/Son language fills the first chapter of Hebrews, designating Jesus as God’s exalted covenant partner who will rule on his behalf. In the process, he brings „many sons and daughters to glory“ (Hebrews 2:10). That is, he facilitates the restoration of the family of God to a right relationsship with him so we, too, can radiate God’s glory.

    Each aspect of Jesus’ ministry teaches us something about what it means to be a human. For example, why did Jesus heal people? Since Jesus is the model human, we need to get this right. In John 9, Jesus heals a man born blind. The man’s blindness was an occaison for Jesus’ public demonstration of power to reveal his messianic identity. At the same time, Jesus exposed the problematic theology of his disciples and the Jewish religious leaders. The point of the story is not to highlight the man’s deficiency but rather to unveil Jesus’ identity in the light of Israels’ hard-heartedness. Jesus’ healing of the man born blind was not just an act of compassion. Jesus was not simply „fixing“ this man’s problem. More importantly, he was exposing unbelief and anncounding his identity as the one who had come to fulfill Isaiah’s prophecies.

    Jesus’ death was the culmination of humanity’s purpose. He was „obedient unto death“ – refusing to cling to power or autonomy (see Philippians 2:8). Faced with the same choice as the first humans, Jesus conquered sin and death by facing it head-on and receiving the judgement that humanity deserved. He did so willingly, taking on the full penalty of human rebellion as our representative. This act of self-sacrifice finally repairs the brokenness of the garden. Jesus is the inverse of the first humans.

    John’s insights stand out as particularly relevant for the question of this series: What does it mean to be human? As the second Adam, Jesus relives the choice of the first humans. Rather than setting out to find his own path to glory, Jesus entrusts himself to the Father. His last act on the cross connects his own mother with John, the beloved disciple (John 19:25-27). In this way he creates a new human family, were „parent“ and „child“ are bound by loving commitment rather than by blood.

    Jesus’ last words on the cross in John’s Gospel bring completion to his important work: „It is finished“ (John 19:30). All this took place on the „day of Preparation, and the next day wasa to be a special Sabbath“ (John 19:31; cf. 19:14). Just as God had finished his work of creation before the Sabbath (Genesis 2:2), Jesus finishes his work of ushering in the new creation by fullfilling humanity’s purpose through self-giving love and full obedience to God’s command.

    Jesus died as the ultimate human, willingly taking on his innocent self the punishment we deserve.

    A new Humanity

    In the Genesis account, all the days of creation end with „and it was evening, and it was morning, the … day“. However, the seventh day did not end. On the seventh day, God rested from his creative activity … until this point in time. With Jesus‘ resurrection, John is signalling the beginning of a new week, a new creation.

    In John’s letter, Jesus addresses Mary Magdalene as „woman“ (John 20:15), which involuntarily reminds us of the Garden of Eden. In contrast to Eve, Mary’s eyes are opened and she recognises Jesus. Then Jesus calls her by name an comissions her to tell the other disciples that he’s alive. This moment is a beautiful restoration of creation design for partnership, contrary to first-century cultural convetion.

    Jesus’ physical resurrection indicates God’s ongoing purposes for embodied humans on earth. His commissioning of Mary with the news of this resurrection affirms God’s intentions for the partnership of men an women in the gospel ministry.

    Many Christians have the belief that they will go to heaven after death. But if Jesus existed in heaven beforehand and then came to earth, why was he not immediately resurrected in heaven after his death? Such questions were already on the minds of his followers in the first decades and even more so in the centuries that followed. The Gospels say that he was dead for three days before he was resurrected and reappeared as a human being. Where was he in the meantime? Did he live again as a man or was he a spirit who was only using another human body temporarily? Or did he not die on the cross at all, but is it the case – as many Muslims believe today – that the Jews only thought they had killed him? Quite a lot of profound questions that we cannot answer here without going too far off topic.

    But according to the Gospels, he did not just take on any human body, but at least once one that resembled the one he had at his death, including the wounds. Why? The continuity between his incarnation and the resurreection body suggests that we, too, will be our embodied selves in the new creation. We will be ourselves in the resurrection – you will be able to recognise me again.

    For some, this may be a rather surprising or even absurd thought. And it deserves a closer look. Which we will do in later videos.

    Jesus’ scars underscore the continuity between our present bodies and our resurrected bodies.

    But why is it so important to talk about Jesus‘ resurrection and not marginalise it? If we miss Jesus’ ascension, we run the risk ov overspiritualizing his ongoing ministry as well as our own. Scripture tells us that Jesus will return in the same way he departed – bodily and visibly – to bring his kongdom reign to earth (Acts 1:11). And according to the Gospel of John, Jesus describes his spiritual rebirth as „born again“ or, more precisely, „born from above“ (John 3:3-8) What does this mean for us humans?

    N. T. Wright says: „Genuine Christian hope, rooted inJesus’s resurrection, is the hope for God’s renewal of all things, for his overcoming of corruption, decay, and death, for his filling of the whole cosmos with his love and grace, his power and glory.“ This will be discussed in more detail in later videos.

    Here is just a hint. Why does Paul speak in 1 Corinthians 15:19-22 in the context of Jesus‘ resurrection of being a “ firstfruit“? „By calling Christ’s resurrected body a firstfruit, Paul implies that his resurrection is not a unique, one-time event, but a taste of what is in store for every believer.“

    Carmen Imes concludes this chapter with two further interesting key ideas:

    Jesus’ ascencion inaugurates his ministry as judge and as high priest, and it emporers us to carry on his work.

    Our mortality is a signpost on the way to a future in which all will be restored.

    The Beloved Community

    Those who grew up in the Christian world today are generally not familiar with the context in which the gospel was proclaimed. Humanity at that time was strictly divided in every conceivable way: by class, language, ethnicity, citizenship, religion, gender, etc. In Paul’s letters, for example, a distinction is made clear again and again from the perspective of the Jews: we – as God’s chosen people – and the others, the Gentiles. We probably cannot imagine how deeply this was anchored in the life of a person who sincerely wanted to worship Yahweh according to the covenant of Sinai. And now comes this with the gospel: „In him you also, who have heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation, have been sealed in him as believers by the Spirit of promise, the Holy Spirit.“ (Ephesians 1:13 Züricher) This was shocking news for them: the spiritual blessings were now also open to the Gentiles. This is why Paul now refers to everyone – Jews and Gentiles alike – as the body of Christ. All can now be part of the people of the covenant. And other divisive boundaries are also torn down as far as the hope of mankind is concerned: mutual submission (Ephesians 5:21), the relationship between wives and husbands (Ephesians 5:22-23), slave and free (Ephesians 6:5-9). „But in the Lord the wife is not without the husband, nor the husband without the wife.“ (1 Corinthians 11:11 Zurich). „For all of you who were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female. For you are all one in Christ Jesus.“ (Galatians 3:27,28 Züricher) In the Christian community, everyone is equal. Everything is reset to the beginning.

    The gospel makes possible a human community undivided by race or by physical or cognitive ability.

    With this in mind, we can also reflect on why Jesus asked his followers to commemorate him by partaking of bread and wine together. There are no ‚observers‘ in the body of Christ. We are one family.

    True community is made possible by physical presence and shared participation in communion.

    It is not that God has given gifts to individuals, but that we are gifts to others (Ephesians 4:11-12). Jesus was the perfect image of God. Scripture invites us to look to Christ to learn how to be ourselves. Then the translation of Romans 8:28 proposed by scholar Haley Goranson Jacob also makes sense: „God works all things for good with those who love God, who are called according to his purpose.“ We are not simply waiting for redemption. Instead, we actively partner with God in this work of transformation.

    Our future include the redeption and glorification of our bodies as we experience full adoption into God’s royal family.

    From Creation to New Creation

    Finally, Carmen Imes addresses two ideas that are widespread among Christians, but which are not found in the New Testament and only found their way into Christianity much later: The idea that our future is in heaven, the earth will be destroyed and believers will be raptured beforehand.

    However, if we read the New Testament without reservation, we will not find these thoughts. Instead, we find the restoration of creation and God’s reign on earth.

    Jesus’ return will not signal the destruction of this planet or the secret rapture of believers but will instead initiate his reign as king on earth.

    Didn’t Jesus himself say in the so-called Lord’s Prayer: „Your kingdom come. Your will be done on earth as it is in heaven“ (Matthew 6:10 Zurich). Carmen Imes therefore summarizes the thoughts as follows:

    The rebellious powers of heaven and earth will be decisively defeated, and this world will be purified and restored.

    However, this should not lead us to simply wait passively:

    Jesus calls us to turn from sin, declare our allegiance to him, and wait expectantly for his return. While waiting, we are to exercise our human vocation as stewards of creation.

    The last thoughts came without further explanation and may have been unexpected for you. Therefore, we will talk about this unexpected hope in later videos.

  • Being God’s Image – Part 5

    Being God’s Image – Part 5

    By Christian / Carmen Joy Imes


    In this series, we look at thoughts from the book Being God’s Image – Why Creation still matters by Carmen Joy Imes. As there is unfortunately no German translation, we will at least deal with excerpts from her presentation in the German version of this video. This English version contains the same excerpts, but I recommend that you read the complete book.

    As announced in the fourth part, we will only deal with the „path of wisdom“.

    The Human Quest

    If you were to ask Father Christmas what is most often on people’s wish lists, he would be unlikely to answer: Wisdom. Yet wisdom is actually one of the most important things you should acquire in life.

    According to the Bible, we cultivate wisdom in two ways: First, by trusting God as th source of wisdom. And second by carefully observing the way the world works and choosing what is good.

    Accordingly, we have the books of Proverbs, Ecclesiastes and Song of Songs in the Bible. Interestingly, the sages are not claiming to speak on God’s behalf.

    Wisdom is something we must want. We must love her and spend all we have on her, cherishinig and embracing her. IIf we don’t do this, our story could end like Solomon’s: It proves that wisdom is not an achievement to gloat over but a muscle to exercise. Or as N.T. Wright suggests: „Love is the peepest mode of knowing because it is love that, while completely egaging with reality other than itself, affirms and celebrates the other-than-self reality.“

    If you now have the impression that this is a rather difficult task for clever people, then the Bible sets the record straight: „O simple ones, learn to be shrewd; O fools, gain understanding. Listen, for I speak of noble things, and the opening of my lips will reveal right.“ (Proverbs 8:5,6 BSB) Ironically, the key to discovering wisdom is recognising tha twe don’t have the answers and that we are not in a position to know what’s best. That’s really the whole point – that we learn to depend on God to show us the path to life.

    Human weakness and mortality do not disqualify us from fulfilling our human destiny. Depence on God through honest prayer is the path to wisdom. The book of Psalms contain many such prayers.

    Human Suffering

    But perhaps it has already occurred to you that the book of Ecclesiastes is rather depressing: „All things are wearisome, more than one can describe; the eye is not satisfied with seeing, nor the ear content with hearing. What has been will be again, and what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun. There is no remembrance of those who came before, and those yet to come will not be remembered by those who follow after.“ (Ecclesiastes 1:8-9,11 BSB)

    And apparently the book of Ecclesiastes does not begin with wisdom but with a clear announcement of what a depressing prospect awaits us: „“Meaningless! Meaningless!” says the Teacher. “Utterly meaningless! Everything is meaningless.”“ (Ecclesiastes 1:2 NIV) But who said that and did the person really say it the way it is translated?

    The person is called a ‚Prediger‘ in German. Hence the name of the book in German. In Hebrew it says Kohelet. This means ‚gatherer, church leader‘. In the Septuagint it was translated as Ekklesiastes, which means ’speaker in a popular assembly‘ and from which the name of the book is derived in English.

    What he says in Ecclesiastes 1:2 is: „Hevel, hevel. Everything is utterly hevel„. Hevel means vaporous. It is used as a methaphor. „Everything is like a vapour.“ Ecclesiastes is not saying that everything is meaningless or ‚void‘ as it is sometimes translated. But rather ‚vaporous‘. The wisdom lies in recognising that it is beyond our ability to fully understand the meaning of life. And that if we only ever look to the future, to what we don’t have, to what will pass away, then we overlook the whole of life that is good right before our eyes.

    Ecclesiastes urges us to enjoy the journey. Stop trying so feverishly to figure life out, but be grateful for moments of pleasure and satisfaction – food, drink, friends – this are gifts from our Creator.

    Humans are not in a position to understand God’s ways. God does not owe us an explanation. He simply invites us to trust him. Bad things happen to good people because we live in a world scarred by brokenness. We need to learn to live with the unknown. Human mortality and the brokenness of our world means that we nee to learn to live joyfully within limits.

    This is part of our being today, our destiny to be images of God and to live accordingly. But it won’t stay that way. In the next part, we will look at human in God’s new world.

  • Being God’s Image – Part 4

    Being God’s Image – Part 4

    By Christian / Carmen Joy Imes


    In this series, we look at thoughts from the book Being God’s Image – Why Creation still matters by Carmen Joy Imes. As there is unfortunately no German translation, we will at least deal with excerpts from her presentation in the German version of this video. This English version contains the same excerpts, but I recommend that you read the complete book.

    We concluded the third part with the question of how it should affect our lives and behavior that we are all imago Dei, the image of God.

    The Human Project

    Adam’s reaction to God’s question already showed that his knowledge of good and evil was not far off. Their son Cain kills his brother out of hatred. Then he builds a city. His descendant Lamech took several wives, tyrranized his family and twisted the story of his ancestor Cain to invent a justification for murder. (Genesis 4:19-24). Then in Genesis 6 we learn that even ’sons of God‘ like Adam and Eve transgressed the boundaries set for them by God. In my opinion, the most conclusive explanation is that these ’sons of God‘ were spiritual beings created by God. The situation gets so bad that God puts an end to it with the flood. So had ‚the human project‘ failed?

    In these first chapters of Genesis we also find Abel, Enosh, Noah and others who ‚called on the name of Yahweh‘. (Genesis 4:26) What was different about them?

    To be human is to know our place in the created order.

    Sin does not erase our identity as the imago Dei, but it prevents us from fully reflecting God’s glory.

    Being God’s image, Carmen Joy Imes

    In fact, the situation was so bad that Yahweh started a new beginning of the ‚human project‘. Those who read the account of the Flood may overlook this aspect: the account in Genesis 6-9 is designed to represent a reversal of the creation of the earth, with water from above flooding and covering the land, thus undoing Genesis 1. A new beginning. And this is also reflected in the artful chiasm of this account. The second part of the account mirrors the first:

    Being God’s image, Carmen Joy Imes

    The people get the habitable land back. God has not forgotten the one whose obedience made divine salvation possible. But the flood had not repaired humanity itself, the problem of rebellion and broken relationships had not been solved. Yet, quite to the contrary, human identity as the image of God had not changed either. God’s blessing is still intact: „Then God blessed Noah and his sons. He said: „Be fruitful, multiply and fill the earth.“ (Genesis 9). Interestingly, however, the part „subdue them“ from Genesis 1:28 is no longer mentioned. The Hebrew there is kabash, which is a very strong word that implies the possible use of force and power. But the use of force was one of the evils that prevented people from truly proving themselves to be the image of God. Therefore, God now sets clear limits on the killing of animals and humans. (Genesis 9).

    Calling the shots

    This is the second time that Yahweh has provided a good start for his images. The next chapter – Genesis 10 – contains the so-called table of nations of Noah’s descendants, which plays an interesting role in a different context. In this context, it is interesting to note that the story of the Tower of Babel is found directly after this in Genesis 11. God had endowed people with abilities and power to fulfill his mission. Genesis 11 shows his reaction to people misusing these abilities to build an unauthorized central power.

    But the account of the building of the tower of Babel teaches us something important about what it means to be God’s image – or rather, to deviate from it.

    Why did they want to build a tower „whose top reaches to the heavens“ (Genesis 11:4)?

    Many think that the people wanted to ascend to heaven in order to achieve divine status. But that is not what the text says. What they wanted was not to be scattered over the earth – which was God’s mandate for his images.

    Considering the biblical and historical context, a second interpretation is more likely. Such towers or ziggurats were to enable the gods to move between heaven and earth! Does that seem strange to you? Then read Jacob’s dream in Genesis 28, and then Genesis 11:5 also makes sense. The tower has fulfilled its purpose to a certain extent – just not at all in the way they thought it would: „Yahweh came down to see what the people were building – a city with a tower!“ (Genesis 11:5, New Testament). „Then the LORD came down …“ (Genesis 11:5 Zurich). They imagined that the gods would come down. And the biblical text takes up this idea and lets Yahweh descend, so to speak. We know the outcome.

    There is (at least) a third possibility, as there is no mention of a temple in connection with Babel. The tower was intended as what is called a migdal in Hebrew: It is a kind of watchtower (but has nothing to do with the Jehovah’s Witnesses‘ watchtower). Before this account, Genesis 10:8-12 speaks of Nimrod, a violent warrior whose name means „we may rebel“. A watchtower to help them see enemy warriors from afar. The remark that they had „one language“ also fits in with this. In Assyrian texts, this phrase is used to indicate that a simple second language was imposed on the defeated. Hence the rhyming text in Genesis 11:3 „Come, let us make bricks, and let [them] be set on fire.“

    Be that as it may, the name of the city should not be forgotten: Babel. Some translations translate Genesis 10:10 as Babylon. Babylon is later the city that destroys Jerusalem and brings God’s people into captivity and oppresses them. But God does not tolerate powers that oppose what God has commanded for his images. He shows this in Babel and later in Babylon. Also because of idolatry, which is so contrary to the fact that people should not worship images of gods, because they themselves are the images of the one true God!

    In Genesis 11, God shows people who is in charge! Yahweh has reset the human project for the second time.

    Being God’s image and Bearing God’s Name

    This is where it gets interesting (as if it wasn’t already). The book of Genesis is interrupted 10 times by the Hebrew word toledot, which means „generations“ or „records“. This emphasizes sections that focus on the generations that follow. Toledot is found 5 times in the chapters we have looked at so far, Genesis 1-11 and then 5 times in Genesis 12-50.

    Just as God places Adam in the garden to fulfill his mission, so he brings Abram from Mesepotamia – the heart of human rebellion – to the center of the Promised Land to restore what was lost:

    ‘I will bless those who praise you and curse those who curse you… All the tribes will be blest because of you.’

    Genesis 12:3 2001 Translation

    This promise is the key link from Genesis 1-11 to Genesis 12-50, and this is where the concept of bearing God’s name begins. From this point on – Genesis 12 – the focus of the biblical narrative is bearing God’s name, while the concept of being God’s image fades into the background.

    I discussed this concept in detail in the series „Bearing God’s Name“, which I published before this series and which refers to the corresponding book by Carmen Joy Imes.

    It would therefore be good – if you haven’t already seen it – to familiarize yourself with the ideas of the series „Bearing God’s Name“. In the next parts of this series we will take these thoughts forward and continue with the „Way of Wisdom“.

  • Being God’s Image – Part 3

    Being God’s Image – Part 3

    By Christian / Carmen Joy Imes


    In this series, we look at thoughts from the book Being God’s Image – Why Creation still matters by Carmen Joy Imes. As there is unfortunately no German translation, we will at least deal with excerpts from her presentation in the German version of this video. This English version contains the same excerpts, but I recommend that you read the complete book.

    We concluded the second part with the announcement that we are now starting work as imago Dei, the image of God.

    Getting to Work

    What does this mean for us humans as the image of God, as imago Dei? Let me quote a sentence from Carmen Imes‘ book:

    Doing good work is one way to express our purpose.

    Being God’s Image, Carmen Joy Imes

    I very much hope that I have triggered all sorts of thoughts on the subject of works, faith, salvation, righteousness by works, and so on. And I would like to follow up immediately: It has nothing to do with that at all. Rather, it has to do with the fact that we, as the image of God, want to do meaningful work and that this is good for us. It is part of our destiny. Take Genesis 19:9-10, for example: farmers should not harvest everything in the field or vineyard. That part as the fruit of their labour would be enough for them. But poor people and strangers without land should also have the opportunity to harvest with their own labour and gain a sense of self-worth from it. They shouldn’t be the recipients of all the work that is looked down upon.

    However, the work that God has planned for his images is not about us.

    „The image of God means being placed into a particular set or relationships with God, each other, and the rest of creation, for the purpose of ruling as his royal representatives.“

    Being God’s Image, Carmen Joy Imes

    What are the consequences?

    If I truly believe that every human being is the image of God, created to signal the presence of God to the world, this belief ought to compel me to treat my fellow humans with dignity.

    Women are God’s image, sharing equal dignity and bearing equal responsibility for representing God to creation.

    Being God’s Image, Carmen Joy Imes

    Now we are at the point where we should address certain biases against women that some believe can be derived from the biblical account of the fall of man.

    Let’s imagine the situation with Eve and the snake. If you imagine a picture, I’m pretty sure it’s structured somewhat like this:

    Albrecht Dürer, „The Fall of Man (Adam and Eve)“ 1504

    All the pictures that Carmen Imes (and I) can remember look similar. And they are all wrong on a few points, because this is not at all what the Bible says: Nowhere does it say that Eve and the serpent stood directly under the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. According to the account in Genesis 3:3, why would Eve not simply speak of „this tree“, but of „the tree in the middle of the garden“? So it must not have been a spontaneous decision, but the serpent sowed the seed of doubt. And it worked: „When the woman saw how good it was to eat from the tree, what a feast for the eyes it was and how much insight it promised, she took some fruit and ate.“ (Genesis 3:6 NEÜ) However, there is something correctly depicted in the picture that some men prefer to suppress: According to Genesis 3:6, Adam was then present when Eve took of the fruit: „She also gave some to her husband, who was standing beside her. He also ate.“ Eve is sometimes labeled as the cause of evil. But why didn’t Adam intervene vehemently? He was right next to her when she ate the fruit. And why were they both by the tree in the middle of the garden? Perhaps he was clever and waited to see if she wouldn’t drop dead immediately. And when she didn’t … who knows.

    So they both decided not to act like the image of God. And the serpent was right about one thing: „the eyes of both of them were opened wide…“ (2001 Translation) But what they recognized was only that they were naked. You can hardly recognize a knowledge of good and evil like God when Adam initiates „the blame game“: he first blames Eve as an excuse in Genesis 3:12 and then immediately blames God himself because he ultimately gave her to him.

    Carmen Imes summarizes the situation as follows:

    Their disobedience to divine command and failure to trust God’s good intentions immediately fracture their relationship with God, with each other, and with the world God made.

    The first humans lost mutual trust, mutual respect, innocence, and intimacy with God and each other. Worst of all, they lost access to the presence of God in the garden.

    Being God’s Image, Carmen Joy Imes

    Was this the end of humans being the ‚image of God‘? Carmen Imes argues – as do other scholars – that the reiterated mention in Genesis 5:1-3 („in his image“) and Genesis 9:6 („For as the image of God / he made man.“, Einheitsübersetzung 2016) reiterates human status as God’s image.

    Because the essence of being God’s image is a claim about our identity rather than a capability or function, we cannot lose it.

    Being God’s Image, Carmen Joy Imes

    And that brings us to the question of how this realization that we are ‚imago Dei‚, i.e. the image of God, should affect our behaviour and our lives. We will deal with this in the next part.

  • Being God’s Image – Part 2

    Being God’s Image – Part 2

    By Christian / Carmen Joy Imes


    In this series, we look at thoughts from the book Being God’s Image – Why Creation still matters by Carmen Joy Imes. As there is unfortunately no German translation, we will at least deal with excerpts from her presentation in the German version of this video. This English version contains the same excerpts, but I recommend that you read the complete book.

    We concluded the first part with this statement:

    Creation is the cosmic temple of Yahweh in which he is to be worshipped. God presides over his creation through his images, which he has appointed as rulers over creation to maintain order in it.

    But what is meant here by ‚his images‘? That’s what this second part of the series is about.

    Crown of creation – image of God

    Why have I spoken here of people as images of God? This already becomes clear from Genesis 1:27, when the climax of creation is described:

    And God created man as his own image, as the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.

    Genesis 1:27 englisch Translation of Züricher version, also Elberfelder version and others

    So God created humankind as his own image, as the image of God he created them: male and female he created them.

    Genesis 1:27 translation by Carmn J. Imes

    But perhaps you were also surprised because you remembered the text differently:

    So God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.

    Genesis 1:27 NASB

    Are we now created in the image of God or as the image of God? Which idea comes closest to the original text? The best way to find out is to use (1) ancient culture and (2) other passages of Scripture. In Latin translations of the Bible, the term ‚imago Dei‚ is used here: God’s image. In Hebrew, the word is tselem. This has a sister word with a clear meaning in related ancient languages: it is the statue of a god in its temple. This brings us back to the temple symbolism of the Bible, which we have already mentioned. So we were created to be God’s image:

    Just as a statue of a god is intended to represent that god’s claim to a particular area, so humans are the physical representation of the Creator God on earth. And just as an idol is meant to deflect praise to the actual dity, so humans are to deflect praise to Yahweh. Theologian Marc Cortez calls this „representational presence“: „We need to view the imago Dei as a declaration that God intended to create human persons to be the physical means through which he would manifest his own divine presence in the world.“

    N. T. Wright says we are to be an „angled mirror, reflecting God’s wise order into the world and reflecting the praises of all creation back to the Creator.“

    We are God’s family. Being God’s image involves both kinship and kingship. Wer are part of the royal family.

    Although the creation account climaxes with the appearance of humans, we are not the center of the universe. God is.

    Being God’s Image, Carmen Joy Imes

    „To be human is to participate in creation care on God’s behalf. Our task is to care for the earth the way the Creator would. We continue God’s creative work.“

    You’re probably already thinking about how you can implement this. In itself, it’s good to think about what you can do yourself. On the other hand, it is also a symptom of many Christian faiths to focus very much on the individual.

    „Together we are God’s image. God designed men and women to provide companionship to each other and work side by side in the world.“

    Even in relation to Yahweh himself, this becomes clear in the Bible account in Genesis 1:26: „Let us make man in our image, after our likeness.“ (Züricher). The use of the plural here is neither an honourable designation for God nor a reference to the Trinity. „In an ancient Near Eastern context, the first audience would have heard this as a reference to God’s heavenly court, his devine council. (e.g. Job 1:6-12; Psalm 82; Isaiah 6:8)“ Humanity as the image of God was created by God as part of a community.

    Now that this has been clarified, we can continue reading Genesis 2. And that’s where most people stumble. Because from verse 4 onwards it is apparently told again, but differently. But there is a reason for this: in Genesis 1, God is centre stage. Genesis 2 is about humanity:

    „Genesis 2 explores what it means to be human in relation to God, to the earth, to plants, to the animals, and to each other.“ Therefore, the second creation account focuses on human identity and vocation. This chapter allows us to discover that humans were meant to be gardeners. This becomes clear from Genesis 2:5, where two reasons are given why the earth was not yet fertile: 1. God had not yet caused it to rain, 2. there were not yet any people to cultivate the land. „This statement implies that the intended design is partnership between Godd and humans to cultivate the earth.“ The whole earth was to become like Eden with the help of mankind.

    In this context, we should also briefly clarify why the woman Eve is referred to in translations as a „helper“ of Adam. Was she only meant to be something like a subordinate, not equal to Adam? Not at all, as the original text shows. In Genesis 2:18,20, the Hebrew word kenegdo is used, which is correctly translated as ‚equal‘ or ‚exact match‘ or ‚corresponds to him‘. ‚Helper‘ is the translation of the Hebrew ‚ezer. It occurs over 90 times as a common noun in the Old Testament and is mainly used in two ways: (1) for allied soldiers and (2) for God as Israel’s helper. It is never used in reference to a servant or subordinate. Its primary use is military and is best translated as ‚ally‘. In fact, before Adam and Eve’s rebellion against God, there was no hierarchy separating the two.

    We are all – regardless of gender – the image of God to fulfil his mission. No one is excluded from this. And none of us can fulfil this task alone. No one has to fulfil this task alone. In order to fulfil God’s mission, we need each other.

    And I would like to leave it at that for this episode. Because if this part wasn’t long, it contained a lot of thoughts that are worth thinking about. In the next part, we are getting to work – as imago Dei, image of God.

    Getting to Work

    What does this mean for us humans as the image of God, as imago Dei?

    Doing good work is one way to express our purpose.

    „The image of God means being placed into a particular set or relationships with God, each other, and the rest of creation, for the purpose of ruling as his royal representatives.“

    If I truly believe that every human being is the image of God, created to signal the presence of God to the world, this belief ought to compel me to treat my fellow humans with dignity.

    Women are God’s image, sharing equal dignity and bearing equal responsibility for representing God to creation.

    Being God’s Image, Carmen Joy Imes
  • Being God’s Image – Part 1

    Being God’s Image – Part 1

    By Christian / Carmen Joy Imes


    In this series, we will be looking at thoughts from the book Being God’s Image – Why Creation still matters by Carmen Joy Imes. As there is unfortunately no German translation, we will at least deal with excerpts from her presentation in the German version of this video. This English version contains the same excerpts, but I recommend that you read the complete book.

    In order to better understand our calling and future as humans from a biblical perspective, we need to start with the Genesis account of creation. However, this is a very bad starting point for a video these days because practically everyone already has an opinion on it and switches off: There is everything from strictly literal interpretation to outright rejection.

    But what Genesis is about can only be properly understood if we forget our 21st century context – insofar as that is possible at all – and read the words with the context of the Israelites 3500 years ago. We must take at least three essential differences into account:

    1. People back then were not interested in „what holds the world together at its core“, i.e. today’s scientific approach. Instead, they were interested in who orders the world and is responsible for its functioning.
    2. The concept of heaven and earth back then was very different to today. No, it’s not that it was somehow more limited or ‚primitive‘. As the ‚world‘ of these people was limited to a very manageable part of the earth, something like a globe or a world map was unimportant. What interested them was a description of the ‚world‘ in which the realm of humans, spiritual beings, the dead and the order of the whole was easy to understand. And this was also how the world views or models of other peoples were structured. Anyone who ridicules them today as unscientific has not understood their actual purpose.
    3. The Israelites were familiar with the world views and creation stories from Egypt and Mesepotamia. A comparison of Genesis with these is therefore very revealing.

    Patterns in the biblical account of creation

    Carmen Imes refers here to the work of various scholars, in particular John H. Walton’s work, which can be found, for example, in his book The Lost World of Genesis One:

    The Lost World of Genesis One von John H. Walton

    Jascha Schmitz had already explained the content in detail in his German video series Video Serie Genesis – Schöpfungsbericht der Bibel kritisch hinterfragt. I will therefore only summarise the results very briefly here.

    In short, the creation account in Genesis is not about how God made everything, but why.

    Carmen Joy Imes, Being God’s Image

    To minimise the risk of adding our own ideas to the text of the Bible, it is important to look for patterns that the author uses to emphasise things. What is usually lost in a translation is the rhythm and repetition of certain words or images in the original language of the text. It is the same here: „God said“ is used 3 times for people and 7 times everything else, so 10 times. „Let there be …“ is used 3 times for the heavens and 7 times for the earth, i.e. 10 times. „make“ is used 10 times, „according to their kind“ 10 times, „God saw that it was good“ 7 times, etc. There are more of these. And we find this pattern:

    The symmetry of the creation account in Genesis

    Into the world, which in Genesis 1:2 is still „formless and empty“, Yahweh brings the order we know. On the first day, Yahweh separates light from darkness, which are then populated with sun, moon and stars on the fourth day. On the second day, Yahweh separates the waters – above and below – creating the sky in between. On the fifth day, Yahweh populates them with birds and fish. On the third day Yahweh separates dry land and on the sixth day these are populated with land animals and humans.

    Ancient people were not interested in how things came into existence, but why. And the creation account in Genesis 1 gives the reasons, the why: on day 1, Yahweh provides light and on day 4, celestial bodies with which the Israelites could measure time, which was not only important for agriculture, but also for the observance of the feast days, which were also communicated to the Israelites according to the books of Moses. On day 2, Yahweh provides the area of air between the waters so that fish and birds can live in it on day 5 and more later. On day 3, dry land and vegetation are mentioned so that on day 6 land animals and man can live in it.

    We must not forget that this is not a scientific description of a chronological order, but that the areas are mentioned on days 1, 2 and 3 and, symmetrically, the ‚inhabitants‘ of these areas on days 4, 5 and 6. Even if the 7th day comes afterwards, it is not primarily about a chronological sequence, but about the purpose, the why: everything was good and Yahweh could now ‚rest‘. Not in the sense of ‚rest‘, but that order was now established. There are also more detailed explanations of this. However, the word used here for ‚rest‘ is also used in the sense that the preparations are now complete and the actual reigning can begin.

    Are we still thinking about the Israelites in the desert 3500 years ago? This is what was said about Yahweh, the God who brought them out of Egypt and who wants to make a covenant with them: This is Yahweh, who will be your God and you will be his people who will bear his name. Let us not forget to read and see the Genesis account in this context. That is why the account was written the way it is.

    In connection with the creation account, God’s day of rest and the later Sabbath provision, we can also derive something for our lives:

    The Sabbath calls us to stop working like slaves and start living like members of the royal family.

    We will gain a better understanding of why a royal family is mentioned here as the series progresses. This is about another pattern in the text of the Bible, a metaphor that was well known to the Israelites: the members of the king’s family had a different status from all other people. Not just in relation to the inheritance of kingship, but throughout their lives. This pattern appears again and again in the Bible to describe our relationship with God.

    What idea of the world did the Israelites of antiquity have? Based on the ideas of the nations and according to the account in Genesis and many other texts of the Old Testament, approximately this one:

    Carmen Joy Imes, Being God’s Image

    As I said, we should not be too quick to dismiss this idea as ‚unscientific‘, primitive, naive and wrong, because people were concerned with completely different questions. Today’s scientific world view only answers part of the how and the why within the limited framework of the laws of nature. And even in the standard physical model, there are laws and constants for which there is no further justification. The ancient world view of the Israelites, on the other hand, contains everything that was known to them and the reason why it was like this: the why and wherefrom and the reason why everything is organised in this way and not otherwise. Everything was described in such a way that even the last Israelite could understand where and why things are the way they are.

    Why is the creation account still formulated in this way? Because God did not want to make it clear to the Israelites how it was all ’scientifically correct‘ in contrast to the myths that had long been passed down among the peoples. We might be happy about such an explanation, but it was the last thing the Israelites needed after their liberation from Egypt in the desert. God merely took up the idea they knew and corrected the important points: No pantheon of gods provided for the order of the world – only he alone. There were also no battles between gods before creation. Nor did he use the body of a slain god or goddess as a substance for the earth. This is the case, for example, in the Babylonian creation myth Enuma Elish. He alone is the Creator, the God who showed himself to be superior to all the gods of Egypt, who freed them from Egypt and made a covenant with them so that they would be his people – bearing his name (see my video series Bearing God’s Name).

    The biblical account of creation, on the other hand, is composed in such a way that some scholars consider it to be a kind of liturgy: The 7-day framework of the creation account was designed to be a must for the Israelites‘ working week. A cycle of 7 days is not found in other ancient calendars derived from celestial bodies. According to the books of Moses, it comes from a commandment of God and therefore in Hebrew 7 is a number for completeness. The designation of the 7th day as a day of rest is echoed in Psalm 132:7-8 or Isaiah 66:1,2 where God’s place of rest is mentioned. Many scholars therefore consider Genesis 1 to be a temple dedication text – the cosmic temple of God. But that is another exciting topic, which Jascha Schmitz has looked at in a longer video series in German: Kosmischer Tempel – Zentrales Thema der Bibel That series summarizes the content of Prof. Gregory K. Beale’s book The Temple and the Church’s Mission: A Biblical Theology of the Dwelling Place of God (New Studies in Biblical Theology)

    This is not about a secret message hidden in the Bible. It is about the pattern of a temple, which is used again and again in the text of the Bible. A metaphor with which the Israelites and people of antiquity were completely familiar. A temple was the place of the presence of a god or goddess. In the cosmology of the Israelites, the realm of Yahweh and that of man were separate. However, in connection with Sinai, the Ark of the Covenant and later the temple, the Old Testament speaks of the presence of Yahweh. This is also the case in Genesis – in the creation account in Genesis. This is in connection with the Garden of Eden in paradise and the people. This pattern of Eden is later found again in the construction and depictions in the tabernacle, the temple and on to Revelation.

    Creation is the cosmic temple of Yahweh in which he is to be worshipped. God presides over his creation through his images, which he has appointed as rulers over creation to maintain order in it.

    An interesting statement with far-reaching consequences. But what is meant here by ‚his images‘? We will go into this in the next part.

  • Bearing God’s Name – Part 5

    Bearing God’s Name – Part 5

    By Christian / Carmen Joy Imes


    In this series, we are looking at thoughts from the book Bearing God’s Name – Why Sinai still matters by Carmen Joy Imes.

    In view of what we have looked at in the first 4 parts, the question arises all the more: was that the end of the covenant between God and the Israelites? But then what about the promise he had already made to Abraham that this would be a blessing for all people?

    Who let you in? – Gentiles and the Mission of God

    In 1 Peter 2:9-10 we find the answer, although it could easily be missed by someone who only knows the New Testament. But now that we have already dealt with this topic in the Old Testament, we can recognize what came to the minds of Jewish Christians in the first century when they heard this passage:

    And now you’ve become a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, and a people who were specially selected to announce the virtues of the One who called you out of darkness and into His wonderful light. So, although you haven’t always been a nation, you’re now a nation of God! And although you once knew no mercy, you’re the ones who are now being shown mercy!

    1 Peter 2:9-10 2001 Translation

    Do the words sound familiar? We have quoted them before:

    Now, if you’ll listen to what I say and keep My Sacred Agreement, you’ll be a special people to Me that will be higher than all other nations! ‘And because the whole earth is Mine, you’ll become My holy nation and a Kingdom of Priests.’ ‘Now, [go] and tell this to the children of IsraEl!’

    Exodus 19:5-6 2001 Translation

    By naming the titles from the covenant and thus referring to Exodus 19:5, we also have a reference to Yahweh’s segullah – his personal, special property But to whom are the words in 1 Peter addressed? To the disciples of Jesus in Asia Minor, who are Gentiles! That is why we also read: „In the past you were not his people.“.

    But 1 Peter goes one better: „you are a chosen race“. γένος (genos) „offspring, race, people, nation“ Where does this come from and to whom did it refer exclusively until now?

    Then, all the wild beasts will give praise to Me… Even ostrich daughters and those who are chained. ‘For, into their deserts, I will bring water… Yes, rivers into [all the] dry places For My chosen people to drink. For, they are the people I purchased, And they should describe all My virtues!

    Isaiah 43:20,21 2001 Translation

    The reason for being chosen is still the same: to bear God’s name and thus proclaim his glory.

    And there is another reference, namely to Hosea. Hosea was to name a son as follows: „And he said: Give him the name Lo-Ammi [The name Lo-Ammi means ’not my people‘], for you are not my people, and I am not one of you [It is possible that „I am not one of you“ in Hebrew is an allusion to the explanation of the name of God YHWH in Exodus 3:14 („I will be“)]!“ (Hosea 1:9 Züricher) Only later was he to change this: „And I will sow them for myself in the land, and I will have mercy on Lo-Ruchamah, and to Lo-Ammi I will say, ‚You are my people,‘ and they will say, ‚My God! (Hosea 2:25 Züricher) Peter argues: If God re-adopts his rebellious people, why shouldn’t he do the same with people from the Gentiles?

    1 Peter 2:9 therefore contains a bold formulation: λαὸς εἰς περιποίησιν (laos eis peripoiēsin) „a people for his personal possessions“. Whereby the Greek λαὸς (laos) and the corresponding Hebrew ‚am were previously used in the Scriptures exclusively for Israel. But now the Gentiles also have the same commission: „If you are insulted because of the name of Christ, you are blessed, for the Spirit of glory and of God rests on you. …However, if you suffer as a Christian, do not be ashamed, but praise God that you bear that name.“ (1 Peter 4:14,16 NIV)

    When Peter speaks of a „royal priesthood“ and „holy nation“, his wording corresponds exactly to the Greek translation of Exodus 19:5,6. But not so with „treasured possession“. Carmen Imes writes about this:

    Peter doesn’t use the Greek word that translates the Hebrew segullah in every other passage (periousios), which would highlight the uniqueness of the treasure itself. Instead, Peter emphasizes the process of becoming Yahweh’s possession by using a slightly different phrase (eis peripoiēsin) found only in Malachi 3:17. This slight shift in phrasing opens up a profound theological possibility.

    Peter’s citation of Malachi is significant because it is the only Old Testament passage where the term segullah refers to a righteous remnant, rather than the entire nation of Israel. In light of Israel’s covenant unfaithfulness, the prophet Malachi had envisioned a future day when Yahweh would select a new segullah made up only of those who fear his name. Malachi had said, “‘They will become mine,’ says Yahweh of Armies, ‘On the day when I prepare a segullah’” (3:17, author’s translation).

    By quoting Malachi directly, Peter shows us that he sees this very promise as having been fulfilled in the believing community made up of both Jews and Gentiles.

    Imes, Carmen Joy. Bearing God’s Name: Why Sinai Still Matters (English Edition)

    How does Peter come to this conclusion? This is not explained further in 1 Peter. But for the apostle Peter it was clear according to the account in Acts. According to Peter’s vision in Acts 10, he should no longer call anything unclean that is no longer unclean for God. And if God has poured out his Spirit on the Gentiles, then they are part of his people. There is no longer any difference between Jews and Gentiles. The only difference that now exists is the one in Malachi 3:17,18 concerning God’s segullah: not everyone in the community automatically belongs to God’s segullah.

    “On the day when I act,” says the Lord Almighty, “they will be my treasured possession. I will spare them, just as a father has compassion and spares his son who serves him. And you will again see the distinction between the righteous and the wicked, between those who serve God and those who do not.

    Malachi 3:17,18 NIV

    And Peter argues accordingly at the meeting in Jerusalem according to Acts 15:

    God, who knows the heart, showed that he accepted them by giving the Holy Spirit to them, just as he did to us. He did not discriminate between us and them, for he purified their hearts by faith.

    Acts 15:8,9 NIV

    And James agrees with him:

    Simon [Peter’s Aramaic name] has described to us how God first intervened to choose a people for his name from the Gentiles.

    Acts 15:14 NIV

    This must have come as a surprise to his listeners: Because until now, a clear distinction had always been made between „God’s people“ and the Gentiles. Either you are part of Yahweh’s people or you are not. And James justifies this with a quote from Amos 9:12, the text in the Old Testament, which indicates that Gentiles will be included in the covenant without converting to Judaism. Carmen Imes explains this text:

    The Hebrew reads, “that they may possess the remnant of Edom and all the nations upon whom my Name will be invoked” (author’s translation). This could imply military domination. The Greek Septuagint reads, “that the remnant of humankind, and all the Gentiles who are called by my name, may earnestly seek me.” Rather than military domination, the Greek translation suggests global conversion. Still, both versions refer to the Gentiles as those “over whom my Name is invoked,” which is the principal point on which James depends. In Hebrew, “Edom” and “humankind” are almost identical, as are “possess” and “seek,” which partly explains the Greek translation.

    Imes, Carmen Joy. Bearing God’s Name: Why Sinai Still Matters (English Edition)

    With what the apostles, the elders and the whole assembly in Jerusalem then decide, they do not set aside Sinai. What they abolish are the laws whose purpose was to distinguish the Israelites ethnically from the Gentiles. What this may have meant for the Gentile disciples when they heard of the decision can perhaps be better understood if we look at Carmen Ime’s formulation:

    You’re invited! You can follow Jesus just as you are. We discovered that hundreds of years ago the prophets looked ahead to this day, speaking of you who bear Yahweh’s name—Gentiles who belong. Welcome to the family!

    Imes, Carmen Joy. Bearing God’s Name: Why Sinai Still Matters (English Edition)

    This is also the goal of Paul’s ministry, as he says in Romans 1:5-8, for example, by incorporating well-known formulations from the Old Testament. And Paul is not preaching a new gospel either, as we have seen in the series „The new perspective on Paul„.

    Our mission

    What does this mean for us today? Carmen Imes sums it up like this:

    Because of the faithfulness of Jesus, we can be marked with God’s name and participate in his mission to bring blessing to all nations.

    Rather than asking if we have to obey Old Testament law, we need to ask what our relationship is to Israel’s covenant.

    Because of the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus, Israel’s Messiah, we have been granted membership in the covenant. We have been incorporated into his renewed covenant community. His sacrifice ushered in a new era. That reality, paired with our changed cultural situation, means that many of the Old Testament laws no longer function for us as they did for Israel. Obeying them by the letter would not uphold the purpose for which they were given.

    The need for a temple has disappeared, fulfilled in Christ, and therefore sacrifices are no longer necessary.

    Laws that were designed to keep Israel separate as an ethnic group have also been set aside.

    As members of his new covenant community, we have the privilege — the grace — of living as his treasured people.

    Far from irrelevant or obsolete, the Old Testament story tells us who we are. It tells us whose we are. And that changes everything.

    Imes, Carmen Joy. Bearing God’s Name: Why Sinai Still Matters (English Edition)
  • Bearing God’s Name – Part 4

    Bearing God’s Name – Part 4

    By Christian / Carmen Joy Imes


    In this series, we are looking at thoughts from the book Bearing God’s Name – Why Sinai still matters by Carmen Joy Imes.

    In the first three parts, we talked about how the Israelites were organized by Yahweh as a people and trained to bear his name. Their task was so that through them all nations could recognize what kind of God Yahweh is. Bearing God’s name was their free choice and they said at Sinai that they would do anything. After 40 years of wandering in the desert, the next generation did the same. And again they confirm their promise when they are in the Promised Land (Joshua 8:30-35).

    After that, we hardly read anything about Sinai, even though ‚remembering‘ is a key theme of biblical theology. This is surprising when you consider the significance of the events. But the focus should be on remembering the liberation, not a pilgrimage to Sinai or something like that.

    Is that the end of the matter? Hardly, because now comes the time when they should bear the name of God as promised, so that all nations can see that Yahweh is above all others and how superior his rule is. Carmen Imes goes into this in the second half of her book. However, I would like to mention just a few of the many interesting points here.

    Enemy #1

    Some were hostile to the Hebrews: First Egypt’s Pharaoh and his arms, then some nations on the move and finally the kings in the Promised Land. But that was not their most dangerous enemy. Their most dangerous enemy is themselves. Again and again they grumble, rebel or no longer want to enter the Promised Land. Their fear of the people is so contagious that the whole nation is in a panic. What is the problem? They refuse to trust in what Yahweh has promised them.

    This also explains why Yahweh reacts with mercy to similar situations before Sinai. His expectations of the people are low. After Sinai, he has not changed. But his expectations can rightly be higher. He had given them a year to learn to honor him and respect each other. But he sees little progress. The pattern is therefore always the same after Sinai: Grumbling and rebellion result in punishment, prayer brings relief.

    The beginning of fulfillment – and what Yahweh sees

    But finally they are in the Promised Land. The book of Joshua illustrates the fulfillment of Yahweh’s promise.

    Then all the peoples on earth will see that the name of Yahweh is invoked over you, and they will fear you.

    Deuteronomy 28:10 Carmen Imes

    However, it is already apparent here that although they have entered the Promised Land, they are not fulfilling their task of bearing the name of God. We read about the Canaanite woman Raab, who is full of faith, and in contrast also about the unfaithful Israelite Achan. The Gibeonites are more convinced that Yahweh will give the land to the Israelites than they are. „The next generation is off to a wobbly start.“

    They quickly lose sight of the fact that Yahweh has taken them from the nations to belong to him. They would rather be like everyone else. In 1 Samuel we learn that even the priests, whose job it is precisely to uphold the covenant with Yahweh, disregard their sacred duties to such an extent that Yahweh announces that this priestly line will be wiped out. Next, they want a king like the others – and they want it now, when they want it. From the book of Judges we learn that they did not fully carry out Yahweh’s commission to conquer the promised land. It follows this pattern again and again:

    Well, a messenger of Yahweh had traveled from GilGal to The Place of Tears at BethEl, to address the house of IsraEl. There he told them: ‘This is what Yahweh has said: ‘I brought you out of Egypt and into the land that I promised to your ancestors, and I said that I’d never break the Agreement that I made with you. However, I told you not to make any agreements with [the people] who live in this land, and that you were not to worship their gods! ‘Rather, [I told you to] destroy their carved images and to pull down their altars! ‘However, you haven’t listened to My voice, and you’ve done [many bad] things… Therefore, just as I told you, I won’t drive them out from in front of you, so they’ll harass you, and their gods will oppress you!’ Well, after the messenger of Yahweh said all of this to the sons of IsraEl, the people started shouting and crying

    Judges 2:1-4 2001 Translation

    And as soon as Joshua died, this happened:

    Also, the rest of that generation was laid to rest with their ancestors. So, another generation came along that didn’t know Yahweh or of the things that He had done for IsraEl. Therefore, the sons of IsraEl started doing evil things before Yahweh, and they started serving the BaAls!

    Judges 2:10,11 2001 Translation

    Yahweh sent judges again and again to free them. But even that did not help in the long term:

    Yet, after each Judge died, they’d just go right back to being corrupt – even worse than their ancestors – by worshiping and serving other gods… And they stubbornly refused to abandon their evil ways, which made Yahweh very angry with IsraEl. So He told them: ‘Because this nation has broken the Sacred Agreement that I made with their ancestors and refused to listen to My voice, I will no longer drive away a single man from those nations among them who were allowed to stay in the land by JoShua, son of NaWeh. ‘[I’m doing this] to see whether IsraEl will ever choose to follow and walk in My ways, as did their ancestors.’

    Judges 2:19-22 2001 Translation

    Did things get better in the time of the kings of Israel? There were only a few good kings. When Solomon dedicates the temple, he says in his prayer that all nations may come to know the name of Yahweh. The fact that Yahweh fills the temple with his glory shows that he stands by his covenant with Israel.

    The first important prophet of the time of the kings is Elijah. Not only does he have to face the king and the worshippers of Baal, but in the end he has the impression that his service has been completely in vain. Interestingly, he runs all the way to Mount Sinai, where Yahweh assures him that this is not the case. He is not alone. There are still a few who do not practise idolatry.

    In the end, it was so bad that Yahweh had to exile them from the land – as he had already warned them at Sinai.

    ‘Then they entered the nations where they had been sent, And there they profaned God’s Holy Name. For the nations that lived there were saying: ‘Although these people belong to Yahweh, He has driven them out of their land!’ ‘So, for the sake of [God’s] Name, Which the house of IsraEl profaned, I spared them in all the [lands] where they went.

    I will make My Name holy again, Which is being profaned among gentiles, The Name that you profaned in their midst… Then those nations will know that I am Yahweh,’ Says Yahweh the Lord, ‘When before their eyes, I’m made holy among you.

    Ezekiel 36:20,21,23 2001 Translation

    That was the low point. Instead of bearing God’s name and upholding his holy name, they profaned his name everywhere. One might even wonder whether the covenant they had broken so often still existed at all. After centuries, wasn’t the situation so hopeless that there was no point in continuing? Shouldn’t he just … start again? A new covenant?

    A new covenant – or the renewed covenant?

    Sometimes a fresh start is the best thing. Isaiah asks for this in Isaiah 63: Back to Sinai. The prophet Jeremiah speaks about this in Jeremiah 31. If you are already thinking about the New Testament, then read Jeremiah 31:31-32 carefully:

    ‘Look… The days are coming,’ says Yahweh, ‘When I’ll make an arrangement with IsraEl’s house, As well as with the houses of Judah. ‘I’ll conclude a New Sacred Agreement. That’s unlike the one that I made with their fathers. In the day that I grabbed their hands to lead them from Egypt’s land. But because they didn’t keep My Sacred Agreement, I had to let them go,‘ says Yahweh.

    Jeremiah 31:31-32 2001 Translation

    A new covenant different from the one at Sinai? Well, the covenant partners are the same. And the reason is not that the covenant from Sinai was bad, but because they broke it. Jeremiah describes the new covenant in the next two verses:

    ‘So, this is My [New] Sacred Agreement, that I will conclude with IsraEl then,’ said Yahweh, I will put My Laws in their minds, And into their hearts, I will write them. Then, they’ll be My people and I’ll be their God. ‘There’s no way they’ll then teach their neighbors and brothers. That they must learn of Yahweh; For, all will know Me from the least to the great. And when it comes to their errors and sins… I will kindly forget them!’

    Jeremia 31:33-34 2001 Translation

    The new thing is that every Israelite will be able to internalize this covenant. The covenant from Sinai was reaffirmed several times by the Israelites. Also because a new generation had grown up. But a covenant with a people, passed down from generation to generation through lineage, has not exactly worked well. This renewed covenant is therefore aimed at individuals who have a sincere desire to bear God’s name – just as Yahweh had said.

    Are we overstretching the term ’new‘ in Jeremiah 31? Well, the same prophet also uses this term in Lamentations:

    Because of the Lord’s great love we are not consumed, for his compassions never fail. They are new every morning; great is your faithfulness.

    ‘For the mercies of [God] never end, And His compassions will never fail. Each morning, they’re renewed, And on Him, we can always rely.

    Lamentations 3:22,23 NIV and 2001 Translation

    And he uses the word as a verb: „Bring us back to you, Lord, we want to return. Make our days new, as they once were.“ (Lamentations 5:21 Zurich). Similarly, Ezekiel speaks of a „new spirit“ for his people (Ezekiel 11:17-20), a „new heart“ (Ezekiel 18:31) and a „new spirit“ (Ezekiel 36:24-28).

    But doesn’t Hebrews 8 just refer to Jeremiah 31 and then say:

    So when he called it ‘new,’[Syr] He [automatically] made the former one, ‘old’… And whatever’s grown old and obsolete is soon destroyed.

    Hebrews 8:13 2001 Translation

    But let’s not let the end of the chapter stop us from looking at the context:

    But the author goes on to describe what exactly will disappear: namely, the sacrificial system. Sacrifices brought forgiveness, but they could never cleanse guilty consciences because people kept sinning. The first system of sacrifice, instituted at Sinai, was only temporary. Now that Jesus has given himself once for all, the earthly temple is not necessary. Sacrifices are redundant.

    Imes, Carmen Joy. Bearing God’s Name: Why Sinai Still Matters (English Edition)

    So did this Sinai story come to an end with the appearance of Jesus Christ? What statements do we find in the New Testament and especially in the Gospels?

    Just give me Jesus – The Gospel witness

    In the texts from the Old Testament that we have read in this series in connection with the Sinai Covenant, we have generally read the name of God Yahweh. If we now continue with the Gospels in the New Testament, we notice an enormous difference: Yahweh no longer seems to appear – at least not in the manuscripts that have come down to us. Instead, it is always about Jesus.

    But the Gospel of Matthew in particular was written in such a way that a continuity is shown here: The child Jesus is called the Christ. (Matthew 1:16), the Greek form of Messiah, the anointed one. But his name is Jesus, which has the meaning: „Yahweh saves.“ (Matthew 1:21,25). If we had heard and read the name in Hebrew or Aramaic, the language in which Matthew was possibly first written, we might already have noticed a parallel to the time of Sinai: At Sinai, Moses has a right-hand man Hoshea, whose name has the meaning, „he saves.“ (Numbers 13:8). Moses changed his name to Yeshua, which means „Yahweh saves“ (Numbers 14:6). And Jesus is nothing other than the Latin form of the Greek Iesou, which is the translation of the Hebrew Jehsua: „Yahweh saves“.

    But that is by no means all. The Gospel of Matthew was structured and written so creatively that Mount Sinai and the events play a major role. Here is just a brief overview:

    • The Gospel of Matthew is divided into 5 blocks, which imitate the 5 books of Moses.
    • Before that, there is an introduction with the story of Jesus‘ parents‘ fleeing to … where? Egypt! It is a reverse Exodus story.
    • When the situation is safe again, they return from Egypt to the Promised Land, repeating, so to speak, Israel’s exodus from Egypt and entry into the Promised Land.
    • Next we read that he is baptized in the waters of the Jordan. This reminds us that the Israelites first crossed the Sea of Reeds and then the Jordan.
    • Then Jesus is sent by the Spirit where? Into the desert. For how long? 40 days.
    • There the Isarealites were tempted to turn away from Yahweh. And that is where Jesus is tempted. And what is Jesus quoting from? „Jesus chooses precisely those chapters of Deuteronomy where Moses is reminding the Israelites of the lessons they ought to have learned in the wilderness, lessons Jesus knows by heart.“

    What lesson does Jesus teach through his answers to the temptations? „No way to success is the right way if it violates the covenant. … The Messiah has passed the test that Israel failed.“

    The Gospel of Matthew focuses on five sermons preached by Jesus. And so the first block of Jesus‘ teachings is known as the Sermon on the Mount. A mountain is the context that Matthew mentions here for a reason. And Jesus also ties in with Sinai: „Do not think that I have come to set aside the law or the ‚words of the‘ prophets. I have not come to abolish them, but to fulfill them.“ (Matthew 5:17) Someone may think that ‚fulfill‘ means that Jesus ‚fulfilled‘ a condition, so to speak, and thus abolished the law. But when the law was given to Israel at Sinai, there was never a clause like this: Should anyone ever keep the law completely, then it is abolished, finished, obsolete. Let us remember: the point was that they, as images of God, bear his name! And for the transgression of the law there was the system of sacrifices. There is no clause that ended the covenant. Therefore, the New Geneva Translation states in the footnote: „but to give full effect.“ If anyone thought that the Sinai and the law had now come to an end, Jesus teaches them something different. On the contrary, he is very uncomfortable about the fact that the Israelites have let it slide and raises the bar to the level that Yahweh had intended with the law: „Do not think that it is enough if you have not broken the law according to the letter, because Yahweh does not want you to think and feel that way in your heart!

    Is Jesus now „the prophet like Moses“ who is to come, as it says in Deuteronomy 18:15? If you consider the context of Deuteronomy 18, then you realize that Yahweh would not only send a prophet to give guidance in the face of idolatry. And that there would also be false prophets and how to recognize them. Acts 3 and 7 also apply this text accordingly. Jesus is also not just a prophet like Moses – he is greater. He is the ‚Son of Man‘, the Lord of the Sabbath, for example (Matthew 12:8)

    In the transformation scene in Matthew 17, there are again many references to Mount Sinai. It happens … on a mountain. The face of Jesus shines. A cloud, glory, the voice of God. Moses and Elijah, who both saw God’s glory – at Sinai.

    If you read further in the New Testament, you will be astonished to find that „reverence transferred seamlessly from Yahweh to Jesus, without explanation or apology.“

    And Jesus continues things the way Yahweh started them:

    But the Lord said to him:
    ‘Go on, because this man is the one I’ve chosen to carry [or to bear] my name before nations, kings, and the sons of IsraEl.

    Acts 9:15 2001 Translation

    And this was not only Paul’s task. The idea that the disciples of Jesus should ‚bear his name‘, just as the Israelites were to ‚bear the name of God‘, is found again and again in the New Testament. In James 2:7 it says: „Is it not they who blaspheme the good name proclaimed over you?“ This phrase is rather unguided in the Greek text because it mirrors the Hebrew phrase used for Yahweh’s name being proclaimed over Israel (Deuteronomy 28:10).

    x

  • Bearing God’s Name – Part 3

    Bearing God’s Name – Part 3

    By Christian / Carmen Joy Imes


    In this series, we are looking at thoughts from the book Bearing God’s Name – Why Sinai still matters by Carmen Joy Imes.

    In the second part, we talked about what changed at Sinai. The Hebrews became God’s „personal property“, „his treasured possession“. However, from the cognates of the Hebrew word segullha with other languages of the time, it is clear that it was also applied to someone in a special relationship with the king. „They have a role that corresponds to their status. Their status is to be a special treasure. Their role is to be a priestly and holy community in the midst of the nations.“ (J. T. Wright, from Carmen Imes‘ book).

    This is also expressed in the ’Ten Commandments‘, which are referred to as ’10 words‘ in the Torah and are instructions rather than laws in the modern sense. The first two ‚words‘ already show what the Hebrews‘ task was: 1. worship only Yahweh. 2. represent him well. Whoever gets to know the Hebrews should get to know God. In this way they would carry the name of Yahweh among the nations.

    Now what?

    Not everything is said with ‚the Law‘. They need further, ongoing guidance from Yahweh:

    ‘{Look!} I’m going to send My messenger to you in order to keep you headed in the right direction; for he will lead you into the land that I have prepared for you. Be sure to listen to him… Obey him! He won’t give in to you, because he carries My Name.

    Exodus 23:20-21 2001 Translation

    Is that why we repeated the law in Genesis? One reason was certainly that 40 years had passed and a different generation was living than at Sinai. But it is also interesting that the structure of Deuteronomy has some similarities with ancient treaties. For example, between the great king and the vassal kings. The agreement, the covenant, between Yahweh and the Hebrews is confirmed once again.

    This is interesting because the covenant was broken by the Hebrews just after they had agreed to keep everything: Moses was not yet down from the mountain with the two tablets of stone, they violated the first commandment and made a golden calf. Moses smashing the stone tablets of the covenant was a clear sign that the covenant had been broken.

    Was Yahweh now completely surprised that the Hebrews so soon stopped keeping their words?

    Next, [Moses] took the scroll of the Sacred Agreement [that he wrote] and read it to the people.
    And they [again] said: ‘We will do and pay attention to everything that Jehovah has said.’

    Exodus 24:7 2001 Translation

    Has Yahweh now carried out the punishment for breaking the covenant justly but harshly? That is what the great kings of that time did. And according to Exodus 32, he would have been prepared to do so. This is also how many imagine the ‚God of the Old Testament‘. In fact, however, we have skipped a few chapters between chapters 24 and 32 that show something else: Grace!

    Grace? Between Exodus 24 and Exodus 32 there are 7 chapters that once again show Yahweh’s grace in the ‚law‘, in the covenant with the Hebrews. These contain detailed plans for the sanctuary. So God’s first response to the Hebrews‘ agreement was 7 chapters of instructions for His sanctuary, the means by which they can obtain forgiveness if they break the covenant. This is grace.

    And that’s not all: Genesis 1-7 contains the instructions for priests. Tiresome to read if you’re not one. But let’s not overlook the repeated refrain: „and … shall be forgiven“.

    Another side thought: Yahweh’s covenant with the Hebrews, the law, is therefore characterized by grace. A large part of the provisions revolve around how to forgive. No one is exempt. The provisions are for everyone in the people up to the high priest himself. So how could anyone think that without this they would stand righteous before Yahweh by their own works? And if the Hebrews didn’t think so, what is Paul discussing? We looked at this in the previous series „The new perspective on Paul„.

    Were the Hebrews ready for the Promised Land?

    Ready to roll

    Moses himself was of a different opinion:

    Thereafter, Moses said to Yahweh: ‘{Look!} You told me to lead these people on, but You haven’t shown me where You want me to go yet. ‘You’ve also told me that You know me better than all the rest, and that You care for me… So now, if I’ve found favor in Your eyes, show Yourself to me so I can see You. Then I’ll know that I’ve found favor in Your eyes, and I can be sure that this great nation is truly Your people.’ And [God] replied: ‘I’ll pass before you, to satisfy you.’ Then [Moses] said: ‘But if You aren’t going to [travel] with us, don’t make me go either! ‘For, how would anyone know for sure that these people and I have found favor with You, unless You go with us? [And if You should choose to go], both Your people and I’ll be glorified above all the nations of the earth.’ Well at this, the Lord told Moses: ‘I’ll do this thing that you’ve asked, because you’ve found My favor and I’ve put you above all the rest.’

    Exodus 33:12-18 2001 Translation

    Moses had internalized the lesson: without Yahweh they were nothing. „Everything they were was bcause of who he was. The same is true of you and me. What matters most about is is to whom we belong.“

    What did the Hebrews still lack? The book of Numbers. It begins with the instruction of Jahweh to number the people. Then comes the order of the camp of Israel, etc. … Hardly anyone reads Numbers. But let’s not forget: this book was not written for us, but for them!

    God’s vision takes shape concretely on the pages of Numbers. It’s practical. For people who have only known life as slaves and have had little practive at self-determination, God meets them where they are and makes their task straightforward. Follow me. Camp here. Eat this. Line up in this order.

    Imes, Carmen Joy. Bearing God’s Name: Why Sinai Still Matters (English Edition)

    The enumeration has a completely different effect. The Hebrews were simply slaves. The names of the ruling families of Egypt were remembered. But now it is quite different. It is as if Yahweh is saying to them: You no longer belong to Pharaoh. You belong to me. You are not insignificant. Your families will be remembered from now on as the beginning of a new nation.

    What are they still missing? The priestly blessing of Yahweh.

    The Lord said to Moses, “Tell Aaron and his sons, ‘This is how you are to bless the Israelites. Say to them: “ ‘ “The Lord bless you and keep you; the Lord make his face shine on you and be gracious to you; the Lord turn his face toward you and give you peace.” ’ “So they will put my name on the Israelites, and I will bless them.”

    Numbers 6:22-27 NIV

    In blessing by his name, he is seentially placing his name upon his people. Yahweh had already claimed them as his own at Sinai. Now he istitutes an official blessing to serve as a regular reminder. From this moment they are identified as his.

    It is the clearest indication in Scripture of Yahweh actually putting his name on his people.

    Imes, Carmen Joy. Bearing God’s Name: Why Sinai Still Matters (English Edition)

    As an aside, the Hebrew word eleph, which is usually translated as ‚thousand‘, is used in the census in Genesis 4. The only difference is that there are no numbers in the Hebrew text as we know them. However, the resulting large number of Hebrews of over 2 million does not agree with archaeology, the space available on their journey or, above all, with the Bible itself. In Genesis 3:43, the total number of firstborns is given as only 22,273. This gives a ratio of 1:50 and each Israeli mother should have had an average of 100 children. The word eleph is also rendered elsewhere not as 1000 but as ‚clan‘ or military unit. A number of about 10 men per eleph is consistent with other data in Genesis and historical sources. This gives a figure of perhaps around 22,000 men, women and children.

    Still an impressive amount. And more than enough for the foundation of this new nation of Yahweh. Under his leadership and with his blessing, they would continue to grow. And lest they forget all that we have discussed so far, Yahweh has a spectacular plan: every year the Israelites are to set aside a day to commemorate the last night in Egypt. This is so important to Yahweh that anyone who was unable to celebrate it should do so the following month.

    By constantly remembering all the events and what Yahweh has done for them, one thing is impressed on them: they bear Yahweh’s name.

  • Bearing God’s Name – Part 2

    Bearing God’s Name – Part 2

    By Christian / Carmen Joy Imes


    In this series, we are looking at thoughts from the book Bearing God’s Name – Why Sinai still matters by Carmen Joy Imes.

    In the first part, we saw how events at Sinai are framed in the text of the books of Moses in order to emphasize their significance. And that the Israelites first had to get to know Yahweh and build trust in him.

    What is changing at Sinai

    Now the Israelites have been wandering through the desert for three months until they reach Sinai. What comes next? What did they expect? Had Moses told them what Yahweh had said years before at the burning bush?

    And God replied: ‘I will be with you! This [place] will serve as the sign that I’m sending you.’ sThen when you bring My people out of Egypt, you must serve God on this mountain.’

    Exodus 3:12 2001 Translation

    For Moses, the crucial part was: „I will stand by you“. The decisive factor was not who Moses was, but whose he was. In that situation, God therefore also revealed his name to Moses. This may not be a big deal to some, but it was back then. Most other gods were known under a pseudonym to keep people at a distance.

    At Sinai, everything changes.
    At Sinai, the Hebrews discover who they are and, more importantly, whose they are.

    Sinai is about worship. God’s first instruction at Sinai lays the foundation, a new spiritual route. If we do not understand it, we may well misunderstand everything that follows.

    Then Moses climbed the Mountain of God, and God called to him on the mountain, saying:’ You must say this to the house of Jacob and report [My words] to the children of IsraEl: ‘You’ve seen all that I’ve done to the Egyptians, and how I lifted you as on the wings of eagles and drawn you close to Me. Now, if you’ll listen to what I say and keep My Sacred Agreement, you’ll be a special people to Me that will be higher than all other nations!’ And because the whole earth is Mine, you’ll become My holy nation and a Kingdom of Priests.’’ Now, [go] and tell this to the children of IsraEl!’

    Exodus 19:3-6 2001 Translation

    Yahweh begins with a description of his grace! Grace in the books of Moses? Perhaps we are too fixated on the laws – and our understanding of laws today. We will come back to this again. But this is about Yahweh’s grace. He does not reproach the Hebrews for their behavior so far. He shows that it was his desire to bring them to him and not their merit. And then comes this Hebrew word: segullah (pronounced SEH-gull-ah).

    To fully grasp the significance of Israel’s new status, I need to teach you my favorite Hebrew word: segullah (pronounced SEH-gull-ah). In the NIV, it’s appropriately translated as “treasured possession,” but it helps if we understand the wider use of this word. … Sehgullah appears eight times in the Old Testament.

    The related ancient languages of Ugaritic and Akkadian both employ an equivalent word to refer to someone who enjoys a special status in relation to the king, a covenant partner who is especially treasured and entrusted with greater responsibility.

    In the Aramaic translations of the Old Testament, the segullah is described as “beloved.”

    They are to be a “kingdom of priests,” serving as his ambassadors to the nations, and a “holy nation,” set apart for God’s purposes. In my all-time favorite book, The Mission of God, Christopher J. H. Wright emphasizes that Israel was chosen in order to bless the nations. He says, “They have a role that matches their status. The status is to be a special treasured possession. The role is to be a priestly and holy community in the midst of the nations.”

    Imes, Carmen Joy. Bearing God’s Name: Why Sinai Still Matters (English Edition)

    The law of Moses was a gift for Hebrews. That shows their answer. And how Moses spoke about it or later Psalm 119. Other gods did not answer people. You never really knew what they wanted or why they seemed angry. They had to be appeased. Yahweh is very different: He even speaks directly to the Hebrews. He says clearly what he wants and what is not acceptable. The law is like a fence that protects them and helps them to live a prosperous life within it.

    One more note on the word ‚law‘:

    The English word “law” is both too narrow and too misleading to accurately translate the Hebrew word torah. It is better translated as “instruction.” Torah encompasses a wider scope of material than just laws. And “law” is not the best word to describe what the Torah contains.

    Imes, Carmen Joy. Bearing God’s Name: Why Sinai Still Matters (English Edition)

    The Ten Commandments – Commandments?

    The Ten Commandments are in the Bible – but they are never called that! Excuse me? In fact, Exodus 34:28 speaks of 10 ‚words‘:

    The Hebrew word dabar can also mean ‚matter‘ as well as ’thing‘. This is fitting, because it contains more than just commandments, as we will see in a moment.

    Let’s look at the second misconception that is often encountered: How many panels were there? And how were they described? There are many images of them on the internet. I once took one from Jehovah’s Witnesses from 2020 because they always emphasize how thoroughly they ‚investigate‘ for their pictures:

    Jehovahs Wittnesses, Our Christian Life and Ministry—Meeting Workbook—2020 August page 7
    How many words do you see?

    x

    “And Moses turned and he went down from the mountain, and the two tablets of the covenant document [eduth] were in his hand, tablets inscribed on both sides, inscribed on front and back” (Exodus 32:15, author’s translation).

    Imes, Carmen Joy. Bearing God’s Name: Why Sinai Still Matters (English Edition)

    We see two tablets but very few words. In Hebrew, the ’10 words‘ only consist of 171 words. But there must be a lot more on the back. Well, it’s just an illustration. More importantly, however, we also find here the idea that two tablets were necessary because the text would not have fitted on one. This is not the case. Rather, the Hebrew word eduth, which is translated here as covenant deed, has a special meaning and is found in a similar way in other languages of the ancient Near East. When it came to such documents, the tablet and an exact copy were made. If it was a treaty between two peoples, a copy of each was placed in the temple of their own god so that he could watch over its observance. In this case, however, the covenant was between Yahweh and Israel. Both tablets were therefore placed in the sanctuary.

    Let’s come to the third common misunderstanding: the 10 ‚commandments‘ can be clearly divided into two groups of laws. One that concerns God and one that concerns people. However, this is not an adequate view of these instructions. Even when Israelites violated a ‚commandment‘ from the second group, they spoke of sinning against God (see 2 Samuel 12:13, Psalm 51:4)

    In the covenant community, every part of life is an expression of worship and loyalty to the God who has committed himself to these people. How they treat others reveals their heart toward God.

    Imes, Carmen Joy. Bearing God’s Name: Why Sinai Still Matters (English Edition)

    Do the ’10 Commandments‘ now apply forever because they are even literally ‚carved in stone‘? Right before that, Yahweh speaks of who they are addressed to: „“I am Yahweh your God! I have freed you from the house of slavery in Egypt. You may …““ (Exodus 20:2 NT). They often use a specific ancient context and vocabulary. And they were never communicated to other nations.

    The commands in this ancient context are for the Israelites alone. The torah was a gift to Israel, the people of Yahweh.

    Imes, Carmen Joy. Bearing God’s Name: Why Sinai Still Matters (English Edition)

    Therefore, it makes the most sense to read the first three sentences together as the first ‚word‘. This is shown by the chiasm used (Exodus 20:2-6, Deuteronomy 5:6-10):

    Imes, Carmen Joy. Bearing God’s Name: Why Sinai Still Matters (English Edition)

    The point of images is worship.
    The means of worship are images.

    Imes, Carmen Joy. Bearing God’s Name: Why Sinai Still Matters (English Edition)

    This brings us to the second commandment, from which the title of Carmen Imes‘ book is derived.

    Invisible tattoo: The Second Command

    You must not bear (or carry) the name of Yahweh, your God, in vain, for Yahweh will not hold guiltless one who bears (or carries) his name in vain. (Exodus 20:7, author’s translation)

    Imes, Carmen Joy. Bearing God’s Name: Why Sinai Still Matters (English Edition)

    (S.49). InterVarsity Press. Kindle-Version.

    Many translations render this differently because the translators and theologians thought that this would otherwise make no sense. But what does it look like if you try to let the Bible explain itself exegetically? The next context is Exodus 28: „So Aaron shall have the names of the sons of Israel on his breastplate for the arbitration, as a constant reminder before Yahweh when he enters the sanctuary.“ (Exodus 28:29). And the high priest also has a name on his forehead: qodesh layahweh. „holy, belonging to Yahweh“. The letter lamed before Yahweh is used here, as it was also used elsewhere in ancient seals to indicate ownership.

    The twelve gemstones indicate that the high priest represents the entire nation before Yahweh. The medallion on his forehead indicates that he is Yahweh’s authorized representative to the nation. Now think back to the dramatic declaration of Exodus 19, when Israel first arrived at Mount Sinai. There God bestowed titles on his people like treasured possession, kingdom of priests, holy nation. As his treasured possession, Israel’s vocation—the thing they were born to do—is to represent their God to the rest of humanity. They function in priestly ways, mediating between Yahweh and everyone else. They are set apart for his service.

    Imes, Carmen Joy. Bearing God’s Name: Why Sinai Still Matters (English Edition)

    By looking at Aaron, every Israelite is reminded of their calling as a nation. Just as he is set apart for service (“holy”), so are they (“a holy nation”). At Sinai, Yahweh claims this nation as his very own and releases them to live out their calling. That calling is to bear Yahweh’s name among the nations, that is, to represent him well.

    Imes, Carmen Joy. Bearing God’s Name: Why Sinai Still Matters (English Edition)

    In short, the first two commandments say: 1. worship only Yahweh. 2. represent him well.

    This now makes it clear why the term ‚law‘ as a translation for the Hebrew Torah is inadequate and even misleading: it is not a collection of regulations and laws in our modern sense, but character formation.