Schlagwort: God

  • Being God’s Image – Part 6

    Being God’s Image – Part 6

    By Christian / Carmen Joy Imes


    In this series, we look at thoughts from the book Being God’s Image – Why Creation still matters by Carmen Joy Imes. As there is unfortunately no German translation, we will at least deal with excerpts from her presentation in the German version of this video. This English version contains the same excerpts, but I recommend that you read the complete book.

    As announced in the fifth part, the rest of the series will focus on ‚Human in God’s new world‘.

    Human in God’s New World

    Genesis 1 conveys our essential human identity as the image of God, introducing an important theme in Scripture. However, the phrase „image of God“ only appears in Genesis 1, 5, and 9. After that, the topic of bearing God’s name comes to the fore.

    If we then move on to the New Testament, we find a few more passages in which the image of God is mentioned. Strikingly, these all refer to Jesus. And now comes the kicker:

    Jesus, the Human

    Jesus is not the image of God because he is God. Jesus is the image of God because he is human.

    His entry into human history is not plan B but the culmination of plan A. And this also explains why the Gospel of John begins with words like those in Genesis 1:1: „In the beginning was …“ While every human being is God’s image, Jesus fulfills God’s intentions perfectly for the vocation entailed by this identity. „who shines with the same glory… Is the exact image of His being…“ (Hebrews 1:3 2001 Translation). The Father/Son language fills the first chapter of Hebrews, designating Jesus as God’s exalted covenant partner who will rule on his behalf. In the process, he brings „many sons and daughters to glory“ (Hebrews 2:10). That is, he facilitates the restoration of the family of God to a right relationsship with him so we, too, can radiate God’s glory.

    Each aspect of Jesus’ ministry teaches us something about what it means to be a human. For example, why did Jesus heal people? Since Jesus is the model human, we need to get this right. In John 9, Jesus heals a man born blind. The man’s blindness was an occaison for Jesus’ public demonstration of power to reveal his messianic identity. At the same time, Jesus exposed the problematic theology of his disciples and the Jewish religious leaders. The point of the story is not to highlight the man’s deficiency but rather to unveil Jesus’ identity in the light of Israels’ hard-heartedness. Jesus’ healing of the man born blind was not just an act of compassion. Jesus was not simply „fixing“ this man’s problem. More importantly, he was exposing unbelief and anncounding his identity as the one who had come to fulfill Isaiah’s prophecies.

    Jesus’ death was the culmination of humanity’s purpose. He was „obedient unto death“ – refusing to cling to power or autonomy (see Philippians 2:8). Faced with the same choice as the first humans, Jesus conquered sin and death by facing it head-on and receiving the judgement that humanity deserved. He did so willingly, taking on the full penalty of human rebellion as our representative. This act of self-sacrifice finally repairs the brokenness of the garden. Jesus is the inverse of the first humans.

    John’s insights stand out as particularly relevant for the question of this series: What does it mean to be human? As the second Adam, Jesus relives the choice of the first humans. Rather than setting out to find his own path to glory, Jesus entrusts himself to the Father. His last act on the cross connects his own mother with John, the beloved disciple (John 19:25-27). In this way he creates a new human family, were „parent“ and „child“ are bound by loving commitment rather than by blood.

    Jesus’ last words on the cross in John’s Gospel bring completion to his important work: „It is finished“ (John 19:30). All this took place on the „day of Preparation, and the next day wasa to be a special Sabbath“ (John 19:31; cf. 19:14). Just as God had finished his work of creation before the Sabbath (Genesis 2:2), Jesus finishes his work of ushering in the new creation by fullfilling humanity’s purpose through self-giving love and full obedience to God’s command.

    Jesus died as the ultimate human, willingly taking on his innocent self the punishment we deserve.

    A new Humanity

    In the Genesis account, all the days of creation end with „and it was evening, and it was morning, the … day“. However, the seventh day did not end. On the seventh day, God rested from his creative activity … until this point in time. With Jesus‘ resurrection, John is signalling the beginning of a new week, a new creation.

    In John’s letter, Jesus addresses Mary Magdalene as „woman“ (John 20:15), which involuntarily reminds us of the Garden of Eden. In contrast to Eve, Mary’s eyes are opened and she recognises Jesus. Then Jesus calls her by name an comissions her to tell the other disciples that he’s alive. This moment is a beautiful restoration of creation design for partnership, contrary to first-century cultural convetion.

    Jesus’ physical resurrection indicates God’s ongoing purposes for embodied humans on earth. His commissioning of Mary with the news of this resurrection affirms God’s intentions for the partnership of men an women in the gospel ministry.

    Many Christians have the belief that they will go to heaven after death. But if Jesus existed in heaven beforehand and then came to earth, why was he not immediately resurrected in heaven after his death? Such questions were already on the minds of his followers in the first decades and even more so in the centuries that followed. The Gospels say that he was dead for three days before he was resurrected and reappeared as a human being. Where was he in the meantime? Did he live again as a man or was he a spirit who was only using another human body temporarily? Or did he not die on the cross at all, but is it the case – as many Muslims believe today – that the Jews only thought they had killed him? Quite a lot of profound questions that we cannot answer here without going too far off topic.

    But according to the Gospels, he did not just take on any human body, but at least once one that resembled the one he had at his death, including the wounds. Why? The continuity between his incarnation and the resurreection body suggests that we, too, will be our embodied selves in the new creation. We will be ourselves in the resurrection – you will be able to recognise me again.

    For some, this may be a rather surprising or even absurd thought. And it deserves a closer look. Which we will do in later videos.

    Jesus’ scars underscore the continuity between our present bodies and our resurrected bodies.

    But why is it so important to talk about Jesus‘ resurrection and not marginalise it? If we miss Jesus’ ascension, we run the risk ov overspiritualizing his ongoing ministry as well as our own. Scripture tells us that Jesus will return in the same way he departed – bodily and visibly – to bring his kongdom reign to earth (Acts 1:11). And according to the Gospel of John, Jesus describes his spiritual rebirth as „born again“ or, more precisely, „born from above“ (John 3:3-8) What does this mean for us humans?

    N. T. Wright says: „Genuine Christian hope, rooted inJesus’s resurrection, is the hope for God’s renewal of all things, for his overcoming of corruption, decay, and death, for his filling of the whole cosmos with his love and grace, his power and glory.“ This will be discussed in more detail in later videos.

    Here is just a hint. Why does Paul speak in 1 Corinthians 15:19-22 in the context of Jesus‘ resurrection of being a “ firstfruit“? „By calling Christ’s resurrected body a firstfruit, Paul implies that his resurrection is not a unique, one-time event, but a taste of what is in store for every believer.“

    Carmen Imes concludes this chapter with two further interesting key ideas:

    Jesus’ ascencion inaugurates his ministry as judge and as high priest, and it emporers us to carry on his work.

    Our mortality is a signpost on the way to a future in which all will be restored.

    The Beloved Community

    Those who grew up in the Christian world today are generally not familiar with the context in which the gospel was proclaimed. Humanity at that time was strictly divided in every conceivable way: by class, language, ethnicity, citizenship, religion, gender, etc. In Paul’s letters, for example, a distinction is made clear again and again from the perspective of the Jews: we – as God’s chosen people – and the others, the Gentiles. We probably cannot imagine how deeply this was anchored in the life of a person who sincerely wanted to worship Yahweh according to the covenant of Sinai. And now comes this with the gospel: „In him you also, who have heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation, have been sealed in him as believers by the Spirit of promise, the Holy Spirit.“ (Ephesians 1:13 Züricher) This was shocking news for them: the spiritual blessings were now also open to the Gentiles. This is why Paul now refers to everyone – Jews and Gentiles alike – as the body of Christ. All can now be part of the people of the covenant. And other divisive boundaries are also torn down as far as the hope of mankind is concerned: mutual submission (Ephesians 5:21), the relationship between wives and husbands (Ephesians 5:22-23), slave and free (Ephesians 6:5-9). „But in the Lord the wife is not without the husband, nor the husband without the wife.“ (1 Corinthians 11:11 Zurich). „For all of you who were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female. For you are all one in Christ Jesus.“ (Galatians 3:27,28 Züricher) In the Christian community, everyone is equal. Everything is reset to the beginning.

    The gospel makes possible a human community undivided by race or by physical or cognitive ability.

    With this in mind, we can also reflect on why Jesus asked his followers to commemorate him by partaking of bread and wine together. There are no ‚observers‘ in the body of Christ. We are one family.

    True community is made possible by physical presence and shared participation in communion.

    It is not that God has given gifts to individuals, but that we are gifts to others (Ephesians 4:11-12). Jesus was the perfect image of God. Scripture invites us to look to Christ to learn how to be ourselves. Then the translation of Romans 8:28 proposed by scholar Haley Goranson Jacob also makes sense: „God works all things for good with those who love God, who are called according to his purpose.“ We are not simply waiting for redemption. Instead, we actively partner with God in this work of transformation.

    Our future include the redeption and glorification of our bodies as we experience full adoption into God’s royal family.

    From Creation to New Creation

    Finally, Carmen Imes addresses two ideas that are widespread among Christians, but which are not found in the New Testament and only found their way into Christianity much later: The idea that our future is in heaven, the earth will be destroyed and believers will be raptured beforehand.

    However, if we read the New Testament without reservation, we will not find these thoughts. Instead, we find the restoration of creation and God’s reign on earth.

    Jesus’ return will not signal the destruction of this planet or the secret rapture of believers but will instead initiate his reign as king on earth.

    Didn’t Jesus himself say in the so-called Lord’s Prayer: „Your kingdom come. Your will be done on earth as it is in heaven“ (Matthew 6:10 Zurich). Carmen Imes therefore summarizes the thoughts as follows:

    The rebellious powers of heaven and earth will be decisively defeated, and this world will be purified and restored.

    However, this should not lead us to simply wait passively:

    Jesus calls us to turn from sin, declare our allegiance to him, and wait expectantly for his return. While waiting, we are to exercise our human vocation as stewards of creation.

    The last thoughts came without further explanation and may have been unexpected for you. Therefore, we will talk about this unexpected hope in later videos.

  • Being God’s Image – Part 5

    Being God’s Image – Part 5

    By Christian / Carmen Joy Imes


    In this series, we look at thoughts from the book Being God’s Image – Why Creation still matters by Carmen Joy Imes. As there is unfortunately no German translation, we will at least deal with excerpts from her presentation in the German version of this video. This English version contains the same excerpts, but I recommend that you read the complete book.

    As announced in the fourth part, we will only deal with the „path of wisdom“.

    The Human Quest

    If you were to ask Father Christmas what is most often on people’s wish lists, he would be unlikely to answer: Wisdom. Yet wisdom is actually one of the most important things you should acquire in life.

    According to the Bible, we cultivate wisdom in two ways: First, by trusting God as th source of wisdom. And second by carefully observing the way the world works and choosing what is good.

    Accordingly, we have the books of Proverbs, Ecclesiastes and Song of Songs in the Bible. Interestingly, the sages are not claiming to speak on God’s behalf.

    Wisdom is something we must want. We must love her and spend all we have on her, cherishinig and embracing her. IIf we don’t do this, our story could end like Solomon’s: It proves that wisdom is not an achievement to gloat over but a muscle to exercise. Or as N.T. Wright suggests: „Love is the peepest mode of knowing because it is love that, while completely egaging with reality other than itself, affirms and celebrates the other-than-self reality.“

    If you now have the impression that this is a rather difficult task for clever people, then the Bible sets the record straight: „O simple ones, learn to be shrewd; O fools, gain understanding. Listen, for I speak of noble things, and the opening of my lips will reveal right.“ (Proverbs 8:5,6 BSB) Ironically, the key to discovering wisdom is recognising tha twe don’t have the answers and that we are not in a position to know what’s best. That’s really the whole point – that we learn to depend on God to show us the path to life.

    Human weakness and mortality do not disqualify us from fulfilling our human destiny. Depence on God through honest prayer is the path to wisdom. The book of Psalms contain many such prayers.

    Human Suffering

    But perhaps it has already occurred to you that the book of Ecclesiastes is rather depressing: „All things are wearisome, more than one can describe; the eye is not satisfied with seeing, nor the ear content with hearing. What has been will be again, and what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun. There is no remembrance of those who came before, and those yet to come will not be remembered by those who follow after.“ (Ecclesiastes 1:8-9,11 BSB)

    And apparently the book of Ecclesiastes does not begin with wisdom but with a clear announcement of what a depressing prospect awaits us: „“Meaningless! Meaningless!” says the Teacher. “Utterly meaningless! Everything is meaningless.”“ (Ecclesiastes 1:2 NIV) But who said that and did the person really say it the way it is translated?

    The person is called a ‚Prediger‘ in German. Hence the name of the book in German. In Hebrew it says Kohelet. This means ‚gatherer, church leader‘. In the Septuagint it was translated as Ekklesiastes, which means ’speaker in a popular assembly‘ and from which the name of the book is derived in English.

    What he says in Ecclesiastes 1:2 is: „Hevel, hevel. Everything is utterly hevel„. Hevel means vaporous. It is used as a methaphor. „Everything is like a vapour.“ Ecclesiastes is not saying that everything is meaningless or ‚void‘ as it is sometimes translated. But rather ‚vaporous‘. The wisdom lies in recognising that it is beyond our ability to fully understand the meaning of life. And that if we only ever look to the future, to what we don’t have, to what will pass away, then we overlook the whole of life that is good right before our eyes.

    Ecclesiastes urges us to enjoy the journey. Stop trying so feverishly to figure life out, but be grateful for moments of pleasure and satisfaction – food, drink, friends – this are gifts from our Creator.

    Humans are not in a position to understand God’s ways. God does not owe us an explanation. He simply invites us to trust him. Bad things happen to good people because we live in a world scarred by brokenness. We need to learn to live with the unknown. Human mortality and the brokenness of our world means that we nee to learn to live joyfully within limits.

    This is part of our being today, our destiny to be images of God and to live accordingly. But it won’t stay that way. In the next part, we will look at human in God’s new world.

  • Being God’s Image – Part 4

    Being God’s Image – Part 4

    By Christian / Carmen Joy Imes


    In this series, we look at thoughts from the book Being God’s Image – Why Creation still matters by Carmen Joy Imes. As there is unfortunately no German translation, we will at least deal with excerpts from her presentation in the German version of this video. This English version contains the same excerpts, but I recommend that you read the complete book.

    We concluded the third part with the question of how it should affect our lives and behavior that we are all imago Dei, the image of God.

    The Human Project

    Adam’s reaction to God’s question already showed that his knowledge of good and evil was not far off. Their son Cain kills his brother out of hatred. Then he builds a city. His descendant Lamech took several wives, tyrranized his family and twisted the story of his ancestor Cain to invent a justification for murder. (Genesis 4:19-24). Then in Genesis 6 we learn that even ’sons of God‘ like Adam and Eve transgressed the boundaries set for them by God. In my opinion, the most conclusive explanation is that these ’sons of God‘ were spiritual beings created by God. The situation gets so bad that God puts an end to it with the flood. So had ‚the human project‘ failed?

    In these first chapters of Genesis we also find Abel, Enosh, Noah and others who ‚called on the name of Yahweh‘. (Genesis 4:26) What was different about them?

    To be human is to know our place in the created order.

    Sin does not erase our identity as the imago Dei, but it prevents us from fully reflecting God’s glory.

    Being God’s image, Carmen Joy Imes

    In fact, the situation was so bad that Yahweh started a new beginning of the ‚human project‘. Those who read the account of the Flood may overlook this aspect: the account in Genesis 6-9 is designed to represent a reversal of the creation of the earth, with water from above flooding and covering the land, thus undoing Genesis 1. A new beginning. And this is also reflected in the artful chiasm of this account. The second part of the account mirrors the first:

    Being God’s image, Carmen Joy Imes

    The people get the habitable land back. God has not forgotten the one whose obedience made divine salvation possible. But the flood had not repaired humanity itself, the problem of rebellion and broken relationships had not been solved. Yet, quite to the contrary, human identity as the image of God had not changed either. God’s blessing is still intact: „Then God blessed Noah and his sons. He said: „Be fruitful, multiply and fill the earth.“ (Genesis 9). Interestingly, however, the part „subdue them“ from Genesis 1:28 is no longer mentioned. The Hebrew there is kabash, which is a very strong word that implies the possible use of force and power. But the use of force was one of the evils that prevented people from truly proving themselves to be the image of God. Therefore, God now sets clear limits on the killing of animals and humans. (Genesis 9).

    Calling the shots

    This is the second time that Yahweh has provided a good start for his images. The next chapter – Genesis 10 – contains the so-called table of nations of Noah’s descendants, which plays an interesting role in a different context. In this context, it is interesting to note that the story of the Tower of Babel is found directly after this in Genesis 11. God had endowed people with abilities and power to fulfill his mission. Genesis 11 shows his reaction to people misusing these abilities to build an unauthorized central power.

    But the account of the building of the tower of Babel teaches us something important about what it means to be God’s image – or rather, to deviate from it.

    Why did they want to build a tower „whose top reaches to the heavens“ (Genesis 11:4)?

    Many think that the people wanted to ascend to heaven in order to achieve divine status. But that is not what the text says. What they wanted was not to be scattered over the earth – which was God’s mandate for his images.

    Considering the biblical and historical context, a second interpretation is more likely. Such towers or ziggurats were to enable the gods to move between heaven and earth! Does that seem strange to you? Then read Jacob’s dream in Genesis 28, and then Genesis 11:5 also makes sense. The tower has fulfilled its purpose to a certain extent – just not at all in the way they thought it would: „Yahweh came down to see what the people were building – a city with a tower!“ (Genesis 11:5, New Testament). „Then the LORD came down …“ (Genesis 11:5 Zurich). They imagined that the gods would come down. And the biblical text takes up this idea and lets Yahweh descend, so to speak. We know the outcome.

    There is (at least) a third possibility, as there is no mention of a temple in connection with Babel. The tower was intended as what is called a migdal in Hebrew: It is a kind of watchtower (but has nothing to do with the Jehovah’s Witnesses‘ watchtower). Before this account, Genesis 10:8-12 speaks of Nimrod, a violent warrior whose name means „we may rebel“. A watchtower to help them see enemy warriors from afar. The remark that they had „one language“ also fits in with this. In Assyrian texts, this phrase is used to indicate that a simple second language was imposed on the defeated. Hence the rhyming text in Genesis 11:3 „Come, let us make bricks, and let [them] be set on fire.“

    Be that as it may, the name of the city should not be forgotten: Babel. Some translations translate Genesis 10:10 as Babylon. Babylon is later the city that destroys Jerusalem and brings God’s people into captivity and oppresses them. But God does not tolerate powers that oppose what God has commanded for his images. He shows this in Babel and later in Babylon. Also because of idolatry, which is so contrary to the fact that people should not worship images of gods, because they themselves are the images of the one true God!

    In Genesis 11, God shows people who is in charge! Yahweh has reset the human project for the second time.

    Being God’s image and Bearing God’s Name

    This is where it gets interesting (as if it wasn’t already). The book of Genesis is interrupted 10 times by the Hebrew word toledot, which means „generations“ or „records“. This emphasizes sections that focus on the generations that follow. Toledot is found 5 times in the chapters we have looked at so far, Genesis 1-11 and then 5 times in Genesis 12-50.

    Just as God places Adam in the garden to fulfill his mission, so he brings Abram from Mesepotamia – the heart of human rebellion – to the center of the Promised Land to restore what was lost:

    ‘I will bless those who praise you and curse those who curse you… All the tribes will be blest because of you.’

    Genesis 12:3 2001 Translation

    This promise is the key link from Genesis 1-11 to Genesis 12-50, and this is where the concept of bearing God’s name begins. From this point on – Genesis 12 – the focus of the biblical narrative is bearing God’s name, while the concept of being God’s image fades into the background.

    I discussed this concept in detail in the series „Bearing God’s Name“, which I published before this series and which refers to the corresponding book by Carmen Joy Imes.

    It would therefore be good – if you haven’t already seen it – to familiarize yourself with the ideas of the series „Bearing God’s Name“. In the next parts of this series we will take these thoughts forward and continue with the „Way of Wisdom“.

  • Being God’s Image – Part 3

    Being God’s Image – Part 3

    By Christian / Carmen Joy Imes


    In this series, we look at thoughts from the book Being God’s Image – Why Creation still matters by Carmen Joy Imes. As there is unfortunately no German translation, we will at least deal with excerpts from her presentation in the German version of this video. This English version contains the same excerpts, but I recommend that you read the complete book.

    We concluded the second part with the announcement that we are now starting work as imago Dei, the image of God.

    Getting to Work

    What does this mean for us humans as the image of God, as imago Dei? Let me quote a sentence from Carmen Imes‘ book:

    Doing good work is one way to express our purpose.

    Being God’s Image, Carmen Joy Imes

    I very much hope that I have triggered all sorts of thoughts on the subject of works, faith, salvation, righteousness by works, and so on. And I would like to follow up immediately: It has nothing to do with that at all. Rather, it has to do with the fact that we, as the image of God, want to do meaningful work and that this is good for us. It is part of our destiny. Take Genesis 19:9-10, for example: farmers should not harvest everything in the field or vineyard. That part as the fruit of their labour would be enough for them. But poor people and strangers without land should also have the opportunity to harvest with their own labour and gain a sense of self-worth from it. They shouldn’t be the recipients of all the work that is looked down upon.

    However, the work that God has planned for his images is not about us.

    „The image of God means being placed into a particular set or relationships with God, each other, and the rest of creation, for the purpose of ruling as his royal representatives.“

    Being God’s Image, Carmen Joy Imes

    What are the consequences?

    If I truly believe that every human being is the image of God, created to signal the presence of God to the world, this belief ought to compel me to treat my fellow humans with dignity.

    Women are God’s image, sharing equal dignity and bearing equal responsibility for representing God to creation.

    Being God’s Image, Carmen Joy Imes

    Now we are at the point where we should address certain biases against women that some believe can be derived from the biblical account of the fall of man.

    Let’s imagine the situation with Eve and the snake. If you imagine a picture, I’m pretty sure it’s structured somewhat like this:

    Albrecht Dürer, „The Fall of Man (Adam and Eve)“ 1504

    All the pictures that Carmen Imes (and I) can remember look similar. And they are all wrong on a few points, because this is not at all what the Bible says: Nowhere does it say that Eve and the serpent stood directly under the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. According to the account in Genesis 3:3, why would Eve not simply speak of „this tree“, but of „the tree in the middle of the garden“? So it must not have been a spontaneous decision, but the serpent sowed the seed of doubt. And it worked: „When the woman saw how good it was to eat from the tree, what a feast for the eyes it was and how much insight it promised, she took some fruit and ate.“ (Genesis 3:6 NEÜ) However, there is something correctly depicted in the picture that some men prefer to suppress: According to Genesis 3:6, Adam was then present when Eve took of the fruit: „She also gave some to her husband, who was standing beside her. He also ate.“ Eve is sometimes labeled as the cause of evil. But why didn’t Adam intervene vehemently? He was right next to her when she ate the fruit. And why were they both by the tree in the middle of the garden? Perhaps he was clever and waited to see if she wouldn’t drop dead immediately. And when she didn’t … who knows.

    So they both decided not to act like the image of God. And the serpent was right about one thing: „the eyes of both of them were opened wide…“ (2001 Translation) But what they recognized was only that they were naked. You can hardly recognize a knowledge of good and evil like God when Adam initiates „the blame game“: he first blames Eve as an excuse in Genesis 3:12 and then immediately blames God himself because he ultimately gave her to him.

    Carmen Imes summarizes the situation as follows:

    Their disobedience to divine command and failure to trust God’s good intentions immediately fracture their relationship with God, with each other, and with the world God made.

    The first humans lost mutual trust, mutual respect, innocence, and intimacy with God and each other. Worst of all, they lost access to the presence of God in the garden.

    Being God’s Image, Carmen Joy Imes

    Was this the end of humans being the ‚image of God‘? Carmen Imes argues – as do other scholars – that the reiterated mention in Genesis 5:1-3 („in his image“) and Genesis 9:6 („For as the image of God / he made man.“, Einheitsübersetzung 2016) reiterates human status as God’s image.

    Because the essence of being God’s image is a claim about our identity rather than a capability or function, we cannot lose it.

    Being God’s Image, Carmen Joy Imes

    And that brings us to the question of how this realization that we are ‚imago Dei‚, i.e. the image of God, should affect our behaviour and our lives. We will deal with this in the next part.

  • Being God’s Image – Part 2

    Being God’s Image – Part 2

    By Christian / Carmen Joy Imes


    In this series, we look at thoughts from the book Being God’s Image – Why Creation still matters by Carmen Joy Imes. As there is unfortunately no German translation, we will at least deal with excerpts from her presentation in the German version of this video. This English version contains the same excerpts, but I recommend that you read the complete book.

    We concluded the first part with this statement:

    Creation is the cosmic temple of Yahweh in which he is to be worshipped. God presides over his creation through his images, which he has appointed as rulers over creation to maintain order in it.

    But what is meant here by ‚his images‘? That’s what this second part of the series is about.

    Crown of creation – image of God

    Why have I spoken here of people as images of God? This already becomes clear from Genesis 1:27, when the climax of creation is described:

    And God created man as his own image, as the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.

    Genesis 1:27 englisch Translation of Züricher version, also Elberfelder version and others

    So God created humankind as his own image, as the image of God he created them: male and female he created them.

    Genesis 1:27 translation by Carmn J. Imes

    But perhaps you were also surprised because you remembered the text differently:

    So God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.

    Genesis 1:27 NASB

    Are we now created in the image of God or as the image of God? Which idea comes closest to the original text? The best way to find out is to use (1) ancient culture and (2) other passages of Scripture. In Latin translations of the Bible, the term ‚imago Dei‚ is used here: God’s image. In Hebrew, the word is tselem. This has a sister word with a clear meaning in related ancient languages: it is the statue of a god in its temple. This brings us back to the temple symbolism of the Bible, which we have already mentioned. So we were created to be God’s image:

    Just as a statue of a god is intended to represent that god’s claim to a particular area, so humans are the physical representation of the Creator God on earth. And just as an idol is meant to deflect praise to the actual dity, so humans are to deflect praise to Yahweh. Theologian Marc Cortez calls this „representational presence“: „We need to view the imago Dei as a declaration that God intended to create human persons to be the physical means through which he would manifest his own divine presence in the world.“

    N. T. Wright says we are to be an „angled mirror, reflecting God’s wise order into the world and reflecting the praises of all creation back to the Creator.“

    We are God’s family. Being God’s image involves both kinship and kingship. Wer are part of the royal family.

    Although the creation account climaxes with the appearance of humans, we are not the center of the universe. God is.

    Being God’s Image, Carmen Joy Imes

    „To be human is to participate in creation care on God’s behalf. Our task is to care for the earth the way the Creator would. We continue God’s creative work.“

    You’re probably already thinking about how you can implement this. In itself, it’s good to think about what you can do yourself. On the other hand, it is also a symptom of many Christian faiths to focus very much on the individual.

    „Together we are God’s image. God designed men and women to provide companionship to each other and work side by side in the world.“

    Even in relation to Yahweh himself, this becomes clear in the Bible account in Genesis 1:26: „Let us make man in our image, after our likeness.“ (Züricher). The use of the plural here is neither an honourable designation for God nor a reference to the Trinity. „In an ancient Near Eastern context, the first audience would have heard this as a reference to God’s heavenly court, his devine council. (e.g. Job 1:6-12; Psalm 82; Isaiah 6:8)“ Humanity as the image of God was created by God as part of a community.

    Now that this has been clarified, we can continue reading Genesis 2. And that’s where most people stumble. Because from verse 4 onwards it is apparently told again, but differently. But there is a reason for this: in Genesis 1, God is centre stage. Genesis 2 is about humanity:

    „Genesis 2 explores what it means to be human in relation to God, to the earth, to plants, to the animals, and to each other.“ Therefore, the second creation account focuses on human identity and vocation. This chapter allows us to discover that humans were meant to be gardeners. This becomes clear from Genesis 2:5, where two reasons are given why the earth was not yet fertile: 1. God had not yet caused it to rain, 2. there were not yet any people to cultivate the land. „This statement implies that the intended design is partnership between Godd and humans to cultivate the earth.“ The whole earth was to become like Eden with the help of mankind.

    In this context, we should also briefly clarify why the woman Eve is referred to in translations as a „helper“ of Adam. Was she only meant to be something like a subordinate, not equal to Adam? Not at all, as the original text shows. In Genesis 2:18,20, the Hebrew word kenegdo is used, which is correctly translated as ‚equal‘ or ‚exact match‘ or ‚corresponds to him‘. ‚Helper‘ is the translation of the Hebrew ‚ezer. It occurs over 90 times as a common noun in the Old Testament and is mainly used in two ways: (1) for allied soldiers and (2) for God as Israel’s helper. It is never used in reference to a servant or subordinate. Its primary use is military and is best translated as ‚ally‘. In fact, before Adam and Eve’s rebellion against God, there was no hierarchy separating the two.

    We are all – regardless of gender – the image of God to fulfil his mission. No one is excluded from this. And none of us can fulfil this task alone. No one has to fulfil this task alone. In order to fulfil God’s mission, we need each other.

    And I would like to leave it at that for this episode. Because if this part wasn’t long, it contained a lot of thoughts that are worth thinking about. In the next part, we are getting to work – as imago Dei, image of God.

    Getting to Work

    What does this mean for us humans as the image of God, as imago Dei?

    Doing good work is one way to express our purpose.

    „The image of God means being placed into a particular set or relationships with God, each other, and the rest of creation, for the purpose of ruling as his royal representatives.“

    If I truly believe that every human being is the image of God, created to signal the presence of God to the world, this belief ought to compel me to treat my fellow humans with dignity.

    Women are God’s image, sharing equal dignity and bearing equal responsibility for representing God to creation.

    Being God’s Image, Carmen Joy Imes
  • Being God’s Image – Part 1

    Being God’s Image – Part 1

    By Christian / Carmen Joy Imes


    In this series, we will be looking at thoughts from the book Being God’s Image – Why Creation still matters by Carmen Joy Imes. As there is unfortunately no German translation, we will at least deal with excerpts from her presentation in the German version of this video. This English version contains the same excerpts, but I recommend that you read the complete book.

    In order to better understand our calling and future as humans from a biblical perspective, we need to start with the Genesis account of creation. However, this is a very bad starting point for a video these days because practically everyone already has an opinion on it and switches off: There is everything from strictly literal interpretation to outright rejection.

    But what Genesis is about can only be properly understood if we forget our 21st century context – insofar as that is possible at all – and read the words with the context of the Israelites 3500 years ago. We must take at least three essential differences into account:

    1. People back then were not interested in „what holds the world together at its core“, i.e. today’s scientific approach. Instead, they were interested in who orders the world and is responsible for its functioning.
    2. The concept of heaven and earth back then was very different to today. No, it’s not that it was somehow more limited or ‚primitive‘. As the ‚world‘ of these people was limited to a very manageable part of the earth, something like a globe or a world map was unimportant. What interested them was a description of the ‚world‘ in which the realm of humans, spiritual beings, the dead and the order of the whole was easy to understand. And this was also how the world views or models of other peoples were structured. Anyone who ridicules them today as unscientific has not understood their actual purpose.
    3. The Israelites were familiar with the world views and creation stories from Egypt and Mesepotamia. A comparison of Genesis with these is therefore very revealing.

    Patterns in the biblical account of creation

    Carmen Imes refers here to the work of various scholars, in particular John H. Walton’s work, which can be found, for example, in his book The Lost World of Genesis One:

    The Lost World of Genesis One von John H. Walton

    Jascha Schmitz had already explained the content in detail in his German video series Video Serie Genesis – Schöpfungsbericht der Bibel kritisch hinterfragt. I will therefore only summarise the results very briefly here.

    In short, the creation account in Genesis is not about how God made everything, but why.

    Carmen Joy Imes, Being God’s Image

    To minimise the risk of adding our own ideas to the text of the Bible, it is important to look for patterns that the author uses to emphasise things. What is usually lost in a translation is the rhythm and repetition of certain words or images in the original language of the text. It is the same here: „God said“ is used 3 times for people and 7 times everything else, so 10 times. „Let there be …“ is used 3 times for the heavens and 7 times for the earth, i.e. 10 times. „make“ is used 10 times, „according to their kind“ 10 times, „God saw that it was good“ 7 times, etc. There are more of these. And we find this pattern:

    The symmetry of the creation account in Genesis

    Into the world, which in Genesis 1:2 is still „formless and empty“, Yahweh brings the order we know. On the first day, Yahweh separates light from darkness, which are then populated with sun, moon and stars on the fourth day. On the second day, Yahweh separates the waters – above and below – creating the sky in between. On the fifth day, Yahweh populates them with birds and fish. On the third day Yahweh separates dry land and on the sixth day these are populated with land animals and humans.

    Ancient people were not interested in how things came into existence, but why. And the creation account in Genesis 1 gives the reasons, the why: on day 1, Yahweh provides light and on day 4, celestial bodies with which the Israelites could measure time, which was not only important for agriculture, but also for the observance of the feast days, which were also communicated to the Israelites according to the books of Moses. On day 2, Yahweh provides the area of air between the waters so that fish and birds can live in it on day 5 and more later. On day 3, dry land and vegetation are mentioned so that on day 6 land animals and man can live in it.

    We must not forget that this is not a scientific description of a chronological order, but that the areas are mentioned on days 1, 2 and 3 and, symmetrically, the ‚inhabitants‘ of these areas on days 4, 5 and 6. Even if the 7th day comes afterwards, it is not primarily about a chronological sequence, but about the purpose, the why: everything was good and Yahweh could now ‚rest‘. Not in the sense of ‚rest‘, but that order was now established. There are also more detailed explanations of this. However, the word used here for ‚rest‘ is also used in the sense that the preparations are now complete and the actual reigning can begin.

    Are we still thinking about the Israelites in the desert 3500 years ago? This is what was said about Yahweh, the God who brought them out of Egypt and who wants to make a covenant with them: This is Yahweh, who will be your God and you will be his people who will bear his name. Let us not forget to read and see the Genesis account in this context. That is why the account was written the way it is.

    In connection with the creation account, God’s day of rest and the later Sabbath provision, we can also derive something for our lives:

    The Sabbath calls us to stop working like slaves and start living like members of the royal family.

    We will gain a better understanding of why a royal family is mentioned here as the series progresses. This is about another pattern in the text of the Bible, a metaphor that was well known to the Israelites: the members of the king’s family had a different status from all other people. Not just in relation to the inheritance of kingship, but throughout their lives. This pattern appears again and again in the Bible to describe our relationship with God.

    What idea of the world did the Israelites of antiquity have? Based on the ideas of the nations and according to the account in Genesis and many other texts of the Old Testament, approximately this one:

    Carmen Joy Imes, Being God’s Image

    As I said, we should not be too quick to dismiss this idea as ‚unscientific‘, primitive, naive and wrong, because people were concerned with completely different questions. Today’s scientific world view only answers part of the how and the why within the limited framework of the laws of nature. And even in the standard physical model, there are laws and constants for which there is no further justification. The ancient world view of the Israelites, on the other hand, contains everything that was known to them and the reason why it was like this: the why and wherefrom and the reason why everything is organised in this way and not otherwise. Everything was described in such a way that even the last Israelite could understand where and why things are the way they are.

    Why is the creation account still formulated in this way? Because God did not want to make it clear to the Israelites how it was all ’scientifically correct‘ in contrast to the myths that had long been passed down among the peoples. We might be happy about such an explanation, but it was the last thing the Israelites needed after their liberation from Egypt in the desert. God merely took up the idea they knew and corrected the important points: No pantheon of gods provided for the order of the world – only he alone. There were also no battles between gods before creation. Nor did he use the body of a slain god or goddess as a substance for the earth. This is the case, for example, in the Babylonian creation myth Enuma Elish. He alone is the Creator, the God who showed himself to be superior to all the gods of Egypt, who freed them from Egypt and made a covenant with them so that they would be his people – bearing his name (see my video series Bearing God’s Name).

    The biblical account of creation, on the other hand, is composed in such a way that some scholars consider it to be a kind of liturgy: The 7-day framework of the creation account was designed to be a must for the Israelites‘ working week. A cycle of 7 days is not found in other ancient calendars derived from celestial bodies. According to the books of Moses, it comes from a commandment of God and therefore in Hebrew 7 is a number for completeness. The designation of the 7th day as a day of rest is echoed in Psalm 132:7-8 or Isaiah 66:1,2 where God’s place of rest is mentioned. Many scholars therefore consider Genesis 1 to be a temple dedication text – the cosmic temple of God. But that is another exciting topic, which Jascha Schmitz has looked at in a longer video series in German: Kosmischer Tempel – Zentrales Thema der Bibel That series summarizes the content of Prof. Gregory K. Beale’s book The Temple and the Church’s Mission: A Biblical Theology of the Dwelling Place of God (New Studies in Biblical Theology)

    This is not about a secret message hidden in the Bible. It is about the pattern of a temple, which is used again and again in the text of the Bible. A metaphor with which the Israelites and people of antiquity were completely familiar. A temple was the place of the presence of a god or goddess. In the cosmology of the Israelites, the realm of Yahweh and that of man were separate. However, in connection with Sinai, the Ark of the Covenant and later the temple, the Old Testament speaks of the presence of Yahweh. This is also the case in Genesis – in the creation account in Genesis. This is in connection with the Garden of Eden in paradise and the people. This pattern of Eden is later found again in the construction and depictions in the tabernacle, the temple and on to Revelation.

    Creation is the cosmic temple of Yahweh in which he is to be worshipped. God presides over his creation through his images, which he has appointed as rulers over creation to maintain order in it.

    An interesting statement with far-reaching consequences. But what is meant here by ‚his images‘? We will go into this in the next part.

  • Surprised by Hope – Part 8

    Surprised by Hope – Part 8

    By Christian / Tom Wright


    This series takes up the main ideas from the book by Bible scholar N. T. Wright Surprised by Hope: Rethinking Heaven, the Resurrection, and the Mission of the Church (German Von Hoffnung überrascht – Was die Bibel zu Auferstehung und ewigem Leben sagt).

    I read the book in the German translation. So the quotes are from the German translation and retranslated into English. The quotes will therefore differ from the English original.

    Purgatory, paradise, hell

    In the last part, we clarified the meaning of our present and future bodies in the section „The redemption of our body“. Now the question naturally arises: And what is in between?

    As far as purgatory is concerned, it is basically a Roman Catholic doctrine that is not held by the Orthodox Church and was rejected by the Reformation. It is interesting to note that even Cardinal Ratzinger (Pope Benedict XVI) and other important theologians withdrew very strongly from what the Catholic Church taught on the subject for a long time. However, this teaching also goes hand in hand with the belief that the „saints“ are already in heaven and everyone else … just not yet.

    N. T. Wright questions this idea on four points.

    1. The majority doctrine of all orthodox theologians is that the resurrection has not yet taken place. Resurrection is not the same as life after death; it refers to life after life after death.

    2. The New Testament contains no reason to believe that there are any different categories of Christians in heaven while waiting for the resurrection.

    3. N. T. Wright „does not believe in purgatory as a place, a time, or a state. Purgatory was in any case a late Western invention that has no biblical basis, and its alleged theological foundations are now, as we have seen, being questioned even by leading Roman Catholic theologians.“

    4. „I thus arrive, fourthly, at the following view: all deceased Christians are substantially in the same state, a state of restful happiness.“ (p. 201) „However, neither in the New Testament nor in the very early Church Fathers do I find any indication that those who are presently in heaven or (whoever prefers) paradise are actively engaged in praying for us here in this life.“ (p. 202) „In particular, we should be suspicious of the medieval notion that the saints function like friends at court: We may shy away from approaching the king himself, but we know someone who is one of us, so to speak, to whom we can speak openly and who might put in a good word for us.“ (S. 202)

    What N. T. Wright probably does not know is how much the so-called ‚anointed ones‘, the remnant of the 144,00 who see themselves as the saints, demand precisely this role in Jehovah’s Witnesses today and in the future. All other Jehovah’s Witnesses – the so-called ‚other sheep‘ – will only survive and live if they obey and honour this group of saints.

    The idea of hell is no different. „The word hell conjures up images that are more strongly characterised by medieval imagery than by early Christian writings.“ (p. 204) „The most common New Testament word sometimes translated as hell is Gehenna. Gehenna was a place, not just an idea: it was the rubbish dump outside the south-west corner of Jerusalem’s Old City. To this day, there is a valley called „Ge Hinnom“ at the site. This word is also found in the original text, for example Luke 12:5, but is often translated as hell: „I will show you whom you should fear: Fear him who, after he has killed, has the power to cast into hell Gehenna. Yes, I say to you: Fear him!“ (Züricher) But what Jesus repeatedly emphasises in this and other passages is „that what counts is what happens on earth, not anywhere else.“ (p. 205) And therefore, according to Luke 13:3, he said, „No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish.“ (Zurich)

    Even the parable – parable! – of Abraham and Lazarus says nothing about a hell. „Taking the scene with Abraham, the rich man, and Lazarus literally makes about as much sense as trying to track down the name of the prodigal son. Jesus simply didn’t say much about the future life; after all, he was primarily concerned with announcing the coming of God’s kingdom, „on earth as it is in heaven.“ (p. 206) When we consider that Jesus was rebuking Jews here, it is not surprising that he cited Abraham, whom they regarded as their father.

    On the other hand, the hope may be surprising to some because it does not include an all-reconciliation or a liberal overlooking of all sin and evil. Even though we consistently find in the translations of 1 Timothy 2:4 that God „wants all people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth.“ (NIV). So this translation corresponds to a conviction, but not to the text of the New Testament. It is clear from many passages of the New Testament „that he does not mean „all individual people“ but „all kinds of people.““ (S. 213). For example, Paul clearly states:

    But for those who are self-seeking and who reject the truth and follow evil, there will be wrath and anger.

    Romans 2:8 NIV

    In the description of the New Jerusalem in chapters 21 and 22 of the Revelation of John, it is also clear that some categories of people remain outside. But before we hastily have „an image of two beautiful and orderly categories in our minds, we should also remember that the river of the water of life flows out of the city; that on each side the tree of life grows, and not a single tree, but many; and that „the leaves of the trees are for the healing of the nations“. This is a great mystery that all our talk about God’s ultimate future must make room for. This is in no way to doubt the reality of the final judgement on those who have resolutely worshipped idols and served that which dehumanises us and distorts God’s world. It is only to say that God is always a God of surprises.“ (S. 213)

    Conclusion

    Truly, we have been „surprised by hope“. At least that’s how I felt on some points. As N. T. Wright draws on his decades of experience and backs this up with many examples, this is the case for most Christians.

    Based on my personal life story as someone who grew up in the religion of Jehovah’s Witnesses, served for decades in an ‚exemplary manner‘ and finally consciously left this church, I realise that this hope will also come as a surprise to many former Jehovah’s Witnesses.

    What many former Jehovah’s Witnesses have to deal with is not only the consequences of indoctrination and the treatment by the leadership and members of this cult. Nor is it just the realisation that many teachings specific to Jehovah’s Witnesses were inventions by people who have no basis in the Bible. And which are also increasingly being abandoned, watered down or concealed by the current ‚Governing Body‘ of Jehovah’s Witnesses.

    Perhaps the most difficult thing for former Jehovah’s Witnesses is to read the Bible in a completely new way and also to accept findings in which the statements and teachings of their former religion were not entirely wrong after all. You probably believed that as the ‚other sheep‘ you had an earthly hope and could only survive Armageddon with the greatest effort and then live forever on earth after 1000 years and another final test. Okay, the few ‚anointed members of the remnant‘ have it easier – they die and, according to the teachings of Jehovah’s Witnesses, are immediately endowed with super-power and immortality in heaven. Then you realised that this was a hoax. There is only one hope for all Christians in the New Testament. And so you were of the opinion that you would go to heaven like all God’s children – just like the 144,000 Jehovah’s Witnesses or all Catholics and Protestants. Now you’ve been surprised by ‚the hope‘ that heaven might not be your final destination after all. Or at least your hope is quite different from what you thought.

    If you, as a former Jehovah’s Witness, recognise which teachings of Jehovah’s Witnesses are not based on the Bible but are a fake, you are only halfway there. The house of faith has collapsed and is almost completely demolished. Now it’s time to build up your faith. It’s not easy to learn something new. It is even more difficult to correct something you have learnt incorrectly. I would like to make a contribution to this with this series.

    Rethinking things is an important task for everyone. That is why N. T. Wright’s book contains a third part: Resurrection and the Mission of the Church. However, I will not be looking at this in this series. I hope you enjoy reading and reflecting on it.

  • Surprised by Hope – Part 7

    Surprised by Hope – Part 7

    By Christian / Tom Wright


    This series takes up the main ideas from the book by Bible scholar N. T. Wright Surprised by Hope: Rethinking Heaven, the Resurrection, and the Mission of the Church (German Von Hoffnung überrascht – Was die Bibel zu Auferstehung und ewigem Leben sagt).

    I read the book in the German translation. So the quotes are from the German translation and retranslated into English. The quotes will therefore differ from the English original.

    Jesus, the Judge to come

    Another aspect of hope – which may also surprise some – is this: „The image of Jesus as the coming judge is the central feature of another absolutely crucial and non-negotiable Christian belief: that there will indeed be a judgement in which the Creator God will set the world right once and for all.“ (p. 167) Here, too, we must be careful not to associate the term „judgement“ with what we call and associate with judgement today. The biblical context of the term „judgement“ is decisive and this is not condemnation, but a consistently good thing, as we also find in the Psalms: Everything rejoices because God brings things to good.

    After Jesus‘ resurrection, the first disciples of Jesus were convinced that he was the Messiah. „Their belief in Jesus‘ messiahship could have been a decisive factor in the emergence of the belief in his ultimate coming as judge. This belief was already well established at the time of Paul’s appearance.“

    This reveals another widespread but false assumption about Paul’s teachings: „Because Paul taught justification by faith, not by works, there is no room for a future judgement „according to works“. But this only shows how much many people misunderstood him.

    The future judgement according to works, a judgement that Jesus will hold on his „judgement seat“, is clearly taught, for example, in Romans 14:9-10; 2 Corinthians 5:10 and answerswo. …. This image of future judgement according to works is indeed the basis of Paul’s theology of justification by faith.

    Justification by faith is what happens in the present time, awaiting the judgement of the future day when God will judge the world. It is God’s anticipated declaration that the person who believes the gospel is already a member of his family now, no matter what their parents were, that their sins are forgiven because of the death of Jesus and that on that future day, as Paul says, „there is no condemnation“ (Romans 8:1).

    N. T. Wright, Von Hoffnung überrascht, S. 169, 170

    That should have been enough interesting thoughts to think about for now. Perhaps you too are now „surprised by hope“. And that will probably be no less the case in the next paragraph and next episode, when it will be about the redemption of our bodies, purgatory, paradise and hell.

    The redemption of our body

    What happens after death? The views of people – even Christians – differ widely. But the hope in the New Testament is crystal clear, if perhaps surprising:

    Not only that, but we ourselves, who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for our adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies.

    Romans 8:23 BSB

    What is supposed to be surprising about that? Please read the text again carefully. What idea did you have? This one: „we are waiting for the redemption of our body„. Or this one: „we are waiting for the redemption from our body„? But that’s not what the text says! In this text, Paul does not say that we will be redeemed from our bodies, but that our bodies will be redeemed. Surprise!

    N. T. Wright looks at many passages from the New Testament in chapter 10. I will only mention a few here. If you want to know more, I recommend that you read the book at your leisure.

    „The clearest and strongest passage, which is often ignored, is Romans 8:9-11“ (p. 178):

    You, however, are not in the realm of the flesh but are in the realm of the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit of God lives in you. And if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, they do not belong to Christ. But if Christ is in you, then even though your body is subject to death because of sin, the Spirit gives life because of righteousness. And if the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead is living in you, he who raised Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies because of his Spirit who lives in you.

    Romans 8:9-11 NIV

    But how then is Jesus‘ statement according to John 14:2 to be understood?

    My Father’s house has many rooms; if that were not so, would I have told you that I am going there to prepare a place for you?

    John 14:2 NIV

    This is often understood to mean that one goes to heaven after death, where Jesus has already provided a place. However, we must not read the texts with our understanding of the English words. „The word for „place“ in this passage, monai, is not usually used in Greek for a final resting place, but for a short stop on the journey that will take you somewhere else in the long run.“ (S. 179)

    „This fits in well with Jesus‘ words to the dying criminal in the Gospel of Luke: „Today you will be with me in paradise.“ Despite a long tradition of misunderstanding, paradise here, as in some other Jewish scriptures, is not a final destination but the blissful garden, the parkland of peace and tranquillity where the dead are refreshed as they await the dawn of the new day. The main point of the sentence lies in the apparent contrast between the criminal’s request and Jesus‘ reply: „Remember me“, he says, „when you come into your kingdom„, implying (whether ironically or not is irrelevant now) that this will be in the distant future. Jesus brings this future hope into the present, implying of course that the kingdom will indeed come with his death, even if it doesn’t look like what had been imagined. „This very day you will be with me in paradise.“ There will, of course, still be a future fulfilment that includes the ultimate resurrection; Luke’s overall theological understanding leaves no doubt about this. After all, Jesus was not raised „today“, i.e. on Good Friday. Luke must have understood Jesus to be referring to a state of being-in-paradise that would come true for him and the dying man next to him immediately, on the same day – in other words, before the resurrection. With Jesus, the hope of the future has moved into the present. For those who die in faith, before that ultimate resurrection, the central promise is to be „with Jesus“ immediately. „My desire is to die,“ Paul wrote, „and to be with Christ, which is far better.““ (S. 179,180)

    Referring to 1 Peter, N. T. Wright emphasises what we must imagine by the term „soul“: „The word psyche here, like the Hebrew nephesh, seems to refer not to an incorporeal inner part of man, but to what we might call the person or even the personality.“ (S. 181)

    For the translations have often caused confusion here, as in 1 Corinthians 15:44

    It is sown a physical body, it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a physical body, there is also a spiritual body.

    1 Corinthians 15:44 NRSV

    „Several common translations, especially the Revised Standard Version and its offshoots, translate Paul’s key terms as „a physical body“ and „a spiritual body“. In view of the Greek words Paul uses, this cannot be correct. The technical arguments are overwhelming and clear. The contrast is between the present body, which is perishable, corruptible and doomed to die, and the future body, which is imperishable, incorruptible and will never die. The key adjectives that are quoted endlessly in discussions of this topic do not refer to a physical body and a non-physical body. Yet this is exactly how people in our culture will hear the words physical and spiritual.

    The first word, psychikos, in no way means anything like „physical“ in our sense. For Greek speakers at the time of Paul, the word psych, from which the word comes, referred to the soul, not the body.

    But the deeper, subliminal point is that adjectives of this kind, Greek adjectives ending in ikos, do not describe the material from which things are made, but the force or energy that animates these things. It’s about the difference between the question: „Is this a wooden or an iron ship?“ (the material it is made of) and the question: „Is this a steamship or a sailing ship?“ (Paul is talking about the present body, animated by the normal human psyche (the life force we all possess here and now, which gets us through the present life, but which is ultimately powerless against sickness, injury, decay and death), and he is talking about the future body, animated by God’s pneuma, God’s breath of new life, the driving force of God’s new creation“. (S. 184, 185)

    In this sense, „flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God“. „‚Flesh and blood‘ is a technical term for that which is transitory, passing and approaching death.“ (S. 185)

    I think it is becoming increasingly clear why the title of the book is: Surprised by Hope.

  • Surprised by Hope – Part 6

    Surprised by Hope – Part 6

    By Christian / Tom Wright


    This series takes up the main ideas from the book by Bible scholar N. T. Wright Surprised by Hope: Rethinking Heaven, the Resurrection, and the Mission of the Church (German Von Hoffnung überrascht – Was die Bibel zu Auferstehung und ewigem Leben sagt).

    I read the book in the German translation. So the quotes are from the German translation and retranslated into English. The quotes will therefore differ from the English original.

    When he comes

    However different the Christian faiths may be, believers often have a desire to go to Jesus. However, the main truth that the early Christians insisted on again and again is that Jesus is coming back to us.

    Coming, appearing, revealing and the royal presence

    Interestingly, the concept of the ’second coming‘ or the ‚return of Christ‘ is often the subject of discussion today, although this term only occurs very rarely in the New Testament.

    It may therefore come as a surprise to some to hear that „despite the widespread opinion to the contrary, Jesus said nothing about his return during his earthly ministry“. (S. 154)

    ‚Wait a minute‘, you may think and want to refer to texts such as Mark 13:26: „Then they will see the Son of Man coming in clouds with power and great glory.“ (NEÜ) Or Mark 14:62: „It is I,“ Jesus replied. „And you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Almighty and coming with the clouds of heaven.““ But here Jesus is quoting from Daniel 7, which is why Jesus is not talking about his return but his rehabilitation after suffering. „The „coming“ is an upward movement, not a downward movement. In their context, the key texts mean that although Jesus goes to his death, he will be vindicated by events that take place afterwards.“ (p. 154) And this is also how the early church saw it.

    And what about the parables of a king who goes away, leaving his subjects to manage the economy in his absence until he returns? Even if these parables were also interpreted in this way early on, they „belong to the Jewish world of the first century, in which everyone will have heard this parable as a story about God himself, who had left Israel and the temple at the time of the exile and who finally returned, as the post-exilic prophets had said, back to Israel, back to Zion, back to the temple. … In their original situation … they do not deal with the second coming of Jesus, but with his first.“ (S. 155)

    Even if Jesus did not teach about his return, this does not mean that it is not true. With this topic, it is particularly important not to jump to conclusions. We have to be careful because the parables do not quite fit the Second Coming.

    If the texts that speak of the „coming of the Son of Man on clouds“ refer to the year 70 AD, which according to my reasoning they do (in part), then that does not mean that 70 AD was the „second coming“ because the „Son of Man“ texts are not texts about the Second Coming at all.“

    The return of Christ has not yet taken place.

    N. T. Wright, Von Hoffnung überrascht, S. 156

    But if we read nothing in Jesus‘ words in the Gospels about the return of Jesus, where does this teaching come from? From the rest of the New Testament after Jesus‘ resurrection: „This same Jesus, who has been taken up from you into heaven, will come again just as you have seen him go into heaven.“ (Acts 1:11 NEÜ)

    In Paul’s letters in particular, we find thoughts on the return of Jesus. And also a Greek word that has misled both laypeople and scholars: parousia. „It is usually translated as ‚coming‘, but literally it means ‚presence‘ – that is, presence as opposed to absence. It appears in two key passages in Paul (1 Thessalonians 4:15 and 1 Corinthians 15:2,3).

    In particular, 1 Thessalonians 4:17 has fired the imagination: „After this we who are still alive will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And then we will be with him forever.“ (NEÜ) But it doesn’t say anything about people going to heaven after the ‚encounter‘!

    In fact, parousia had two meanings in the non-Christian world at that time.

    The first was the mysterious presence of a deity. „Josephus sometimes uses this word when he speaks of YHWH coming to save Israel.“ (S. 158)

    „The second meaning occurs when a high-ranking personage pays a visit to a subject state, especially when the king or conqueror visits a colony or province. The word for such a visit is royal presence: in Greek, parousia.“ (S. 158)

    „It should be noted that in none of these contexts do we find even the slightest suggestion that anyone is flying around on a cloud. Nor is there any hint of the imminent collapse or destruction of the universe.“ (S. 158)

    What were Paul and the rest of the early church trying to say?

    That Jesus, whom they worshipped, was close in spirit but physically absent, but that one day he would be physically present and that then the whole world, including themselves, would recognise the sudden transformative power of this presence.

    A word that lends itself naturally to this would be parousia.

    They wanted to say that Jesus, who had been raised from the dead and exalted to the right hand of God, was the rightful Lord of the world, the true ruler before whom all other rulers would tremble and before whom they would bow their knees in fear and amazement.

    And they wanted to say: just as the emperor might one day visit a colony like Philippi or Thessalonica or Corinth (the normally absent but ruling ruler who now appears and rules in person), so one day the absent but ruling Lord of the world would appear and rule in person within this world, with all the consequences that would have.“

    N. T. Wright, Von Hoffnung überrascht, S. 158

    N. T. Wright explains 1 Thessalonians 4 in much more detail in his book. Let’s look again at 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17:

    For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. After that, we who are still alive and are left will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And so we will be with the Lord forever.

    1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 NIV

    First of all, it should be emphasised once again that this text clearly states that the resurrected do not meet Jesus in heaven. We deduce this from the last part of the verse, because the Lord will be in heaven. But that is not what this text says. „The main point to note about these tricky verses is that they are not to be understood as a literal description of what Paul says will happen. They are simply another way of expressing what Paul says in 1 Corinthians 15:23-27 and 51-54 and Philippians 3:20-21.“ Where the NIV translation says „will be caught up“ in 1 Thessalonians 4:17, Paul uses the term „transformed“ in 1 Corinthians 15:51, which is translated as „transformed“ in the Züricher translation for example. Philippians 3:21 also speaks of this transformation as „transforming“.

    It is interesting that Philippians 3:20 is translated in the Züricher version as follows: „For our home is in heaven, from where we also await the Lord Jesus Christ as Saviour“. And the King James Bible has: „For our conversation is in heaven.“ No wonder if someone then thinks that they are going to heaven. But this translation unfortunately reflects a religious persuasion and not the original text. The original text reads πολίτευμα (politeuma), which means citizenship: „But we have our citizenship in heaven.“ The Neue Evangelistische Übersetzung translates this correctly. Also the NIV: „But our citizenship is in heaven“

    What did Paul mean by this? It was certainly not a literal description, because in the next chapter, 1 Thessalonians 5, he speaks of „the thief coming in the night, so that the woman will have labour pains, so that you should not get drunk, but stay awake and put on your armour.“ (p. 161) If these are methaphors, then we are also dealing with a metaphor in chapter 4.

    In fact, three stories in one metaphor. Paul was good at linking things so compactly. Paul links the story of Moses coming down from the mountain (a trumpet sounds here too) with Daniel 7. He links this to Daniel 7 and then adds a situation from the life of the Philippians.

    If the emperor visited a colony or province, the citizens of the city would go and meet him at some distance outside the city gates. It would be disrespectful to actually let him arrive at the city gate, as if his subjects had no desire to greet him properly. If they met him, they would not remain outside in the open field; they would accompany him royally into the city. When Paul speaks of the „meeting“ with the Lord „in the air“, he is not talking about the saved believers remaining floating somewhere in the air, away from the earth, as we find in popular rapture theology. It is about the following: After they have gone out to meet their Lord, they will accompany him royally into his domain, i.e. back to the place from which they came.

    Even if we note that this is a significant metaphor, not a literal description, the meaning is the same as in the parallel passage in Philippians 3:20. As the Philippians knew, being a „citizen of heaven“ did not mean expecting to return to the hometown, but expecting the ruler to come from the hometown to give the colony its full dignity, to rescue it if necessary, to defeat enemies, and to set everything right.

    The reality to which the rhetoric refers is this: Jesus will be personally present, the dead will be raised, and Christians who are then alive will be transformed.

    N. T. Wright, Von Hoffnung überrascht, S. 162

    And so it is no longer surprising when an Aramaic expression suddenly appears at the end of 1 Corinthians. Mind you, an Aramaic expression in the Greek text. Some translations leave it in and you don’t even understand what is meant by it. In 1 Corinthians 16:22 we find „Marána thá – Our Lord, come!“ (Einheitsübersetzung 2016), which goes back to the very early Aramaic-speaking church.

    In Colossians 3:4, by the way, Paul uses the word „appear“ and not „come“. „Jesus does not have to float down from heaven like a spaceman. … When heaven and earth are joined in the new way that God has promised, then Jesus will appear to us – and we will appear to him and to each other, in our own true identity.“ (S. 164)

  • Surprised by Hope – Part 5

    Surprised by Hope – Part 5

    By Christian / Tom Wright


    This series takes up the main ideas from the book by Bible scholar N. T. Wright Surprised by Hope: Rethinking Heaven, the Resurrection, and the Mission of the Church (German Von Hoffnung überrascht – Was die Bibel zu Auferstehung und ewigem Leben sagt).

    I read the book in the German translation. So the quotes are from the German translation and retranslated into English. The quotes will therefore differ from the English original.

    Jesus, heaven and the new creation

    1. Ascension

    For the followers of Jesus in the first century, the resurrection and ascension of Jesus were two completely different things: „Jesus said, “Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father.“ (John 20:17 NIV). And Paul also makes a distinction (Romans 8:34; Ephesians 1:20,2:6).

    However, when John 20:17 speaks of „ascended“, we must understand this in the context of biblical cosmology:

    Basically, in biblical cosmology, heaven and earth are not two different places within the same continuum of space or matter. They are two different dimensions of God’s good creation.

    Heaven is indirectly related to earth, so that someone who is in heaven can be present anywhere on earth at the same time. Therefore, the ascension means that Jesus is available and accessible without having to travel to a specific place on earth to find him.

    Heaven is, so to speak, the control room for the earth; it is the office of the CEO, the place from which all instructions emanate. „All authority has been given to me,“ said Jesus at the end of Matthew’s Gospel, „in heaven and on earth.“

    N. T. Wright, Von Hoffnung überrascht, S. 139

    According to the text of the New Testament, Jesus did not go to heaven at his resurrection, nor did his soul. What idea does the text of the New Testament convey?

    The idea of the man Jesus, who is now in heaven, in his thoroughly embodied resurrection state, is a shock for many people, including many Christians.

    N. T. Wright, Von Hoffnung überrascht, S. 139

    He explains why this is the case immediately afterwards:

    Sometimes this is because many people think that Jesus was divine, then stopped being divine and became human, only to stop being human again after a while in order to return to the divine mode of existence (at least that’s what Christians supposedly believe according to many people).

    More often, however, this is because our culture is so accustomed to the Platonic idea that heaven is by definition a place of „spiritual“, not material reality, that the idea of a real body that is not only present in heaven, but thoroughly at home there, seems to them like a confusion of categories, i.e. philosophically defined forms of state.

    N. T. Wright, Von Hoffnung überrascht, S. 139

    And if you too are now surprised: „The Ascension invites us to rethink all these things; and anyway, why did we assume we knew what heaven was?“ (N. T. Wright, Surprised by Hope, p. 139)

    When thought through in this way, the idea of the return of Christ makes sense:

    But the New Testament, on the contrary, insists that the one who has gone to heaven will return. Nowhere in the Gospels or in the Acts of the Apostles is there a sentence even remotely like this: „Jesus has gone to heaven, so let’s make sure we follow him there.“ Rather, it says: „Jesus is in heaven, he rules the world, and he will return one day to establish his reign in perfection.“

    N. T. Wright, Von Hoffnung überrascht, S. 145

    2. What is the return of Christ all about?

    Are we now heading towards ideas that have become widespread since the millenarian movements of the 19th century? Behind this is often the idea that Jesus has somehow been ‚gone‘ for almost 2000 years and will then return in a dramatic end time. And that „this return is part of a scenario in which the present world is doomed to destruction, while the chosen few are swept away to heaven.“ (S. 148)

    However, we have already seen that this idea does not correspond to the biblical cosmology and the first-century idea that we find in the New Testament. Even in the Psalms, the judgement of the world had a positive meaning: „For God, the judgement of the world means that he will set it right in the end, that he will bring it into order and thus not only cause a sigh of relief on all sides, but shouts of joy from trees and fields, from the sea and the floods.“ (Psalm 96, Psalm 98)

    So what is meant by eschatology?

    The word eschatology, which literally means „the doctrine of the last things“, refers not only to death, judgement, heaven and hell, as commonly thought (and as the word is still defined in many dictionaries). The term also refers to the passionately held belief of most 1st century Jews and almost all early Christians that history was going in a certain direction under the direction of God, and that this direction consisted in the new world of God, the world of justice, healing and hope. The transition from the present world to the new world would not be a matter of destroying the present spatio-temporal universe, but a matter of radically healing that universe.

    So when I (and many others) use the word eschatology, we don’t simply mean the return of Christ, much less a particular theory about that return; we mean the whole meaning of God’s future for the world, and we mean the belief that that future has already begun to meet us in the present.

    N. T. Wright, Von Hoffnung überrascht, S. 151